Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How has the number of US-Mexico border crossings changed since Trump's deportation policy was implemented in 2025?
Executive Summary
The available reports show a clear net decline in US–Mexico border crossings after the 2025 mass-deportation policy began, with Border Patrol apprehensions falling to multi-decade lows in early 2025, though localized rebounds occurred later in the year. Analysts and government updates diverge on causes and permanence: official monthly CBP data emphasize large percentage declines, while policy watchdogs document budget-driven enforcement intensification and note regional surges and consequences like expanded detention capacity [1] [2] [3].
1. Sharp nationwide drop, according to government tallies — the numbers that jump off the page
Federal data indicate a pronounced reduction in encounters at the southwest border early in 2025, with CBP reporting March 2025 as the second consecutive month with historically low daily nationwide apprehensions — about 264 per day, roughly 94% lower than March 2024’s daily average, illustrating a dramatic year‑over‑year decline [1]. This official figure is consistent with the Department of Homeland Security’s assessment that migrant encounters had been trending down since December 2023, reinforcing a downward national trajectory in reported crossings [4]. The government framing centers on measurable decreases in apprehensions and uses those counts as a primary lens for assessing the policy’s immediate effect on cross‑border movement [1] [4].
2. Watchdog groups confirm declines but flag enforcement and funding changes that reshape flows
Policy groups such as WOLA corroborate that overall Border Patrol apprehensions fell to levels not seen in decades, calling out the fewest apprehensions since 1970 while also emphasizing the role of explicit policy shifts and legal changes in driving those numbers [2] [5]. WOLA’s reporting stresses that a large new spending package — over $170 billion in border hardening and deportation funding — amplified enforcement tools that can deter crossings as much as, or more than, underlying migration drivers [3]. This perspective highlights that administrative capacity and fiscal commitments shaped observed declines, suggesting the drop reflects policy and enforcement intensity as much as migrant decision‑making [3].
3. The picture is not uniformly down: regional rebounds and seasonal spikes complicate the narrative
Despite the national decline, multiple updates document important local reversals: WOLA and allied analyses report an 83% increase in Border Patrol apprehensions from July to September 2025, concentrated primarily in Arizona, signaling that regional surges can occur even amid a broader fall in crossings [2]. These rises complicate simple cause‑and‑effect claims about policy efficacy, because localized spikes may reflect shifting routes, enforcement patterns, or short‑term factors like smugglers’ tactics and seasonal mobility rather than wholesale reversal of the national trend [2]. The coexistence of low nationwide averages and pronounced regional volatility is a central tension across sources.
4. Policy mechanics: detention expansion and deportation capacity as explanatory factors
Advocacy organizations and reporting document a simultaneous expansion of detention and deportation infrastructure that underpins the administration’s claims of reducing crossings, noting record detainee numbers and explicit “mass deportation” campaigns that raise the cost and risk for would‑be crossers [6] [7]. WOLA and other watchdogs link the new budgetary resources directly to the administration’s ability to carry out faster removals and stricter processing, framing funding as a key lever in observed declines [3]. This strand of evidence underscores that changes in operational capacity and policy directives materially alter encounter statistics, not only underlying migration pressures [3] [6].
5. Alternative explanations and remaining drivers: why the decline might not be permanent
Government and non‑government reports alike note that structural migration drivers — economic distress, violence, and social instability in origin countries — remain largely unchanged, meaning deterrent policies may suppress but not eliminate underlying flows [4]. Analysts emphasize that sharp enforcement can push migrants to different routes (regional shifts described above) or to more dangerous crossings, and that short‑term data spikes or troughs can reverse if political, economic, or judicial conditions change. The DHS assessment explicitly warns that decline in encounters does not equate to resolution of root causes, framing the observed drop as a policy‑driven suppression rather than a solved migration problem [4].
6. What the evidence collectively supports — cautious conclusions and what to watch next
Taken together, the sources present a consistent quantitative story of large national declines in apprehensions after the 2025 deportation policy, corroborated by CBP monthly data and watchdog reports, while also documenting regional increases, expanded detention, and major new funding that likely contribute to those declines [1] [2] [3]. The most important near‑term indicators to monitor are monthly CBP encounter totals, regional breakdowns (especially Arizona), detention population levels, and legal developments affecting removals; these will reveal whether declines persist or merely reflect short‑term deterrence and route displacement [1] [6].