Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Can you list all of the US political assassination attempts? Please include the political affiliation of both the victim and the killer
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided offer a comprehensive overview of US political assassination attempts, including the victim's and killer's political affiliations [1]. According to the PBS article, recent examples include the 2024 shooting of Donald Trump (Republican victim) and the 2025 killing of Charlie Kirk (conservative activist) [1]. The KOAT piece presents a timeline of notable political-violence incidents, including multiple assassination attempts on figures like Donald Trump and references to earlier cases (e.g., Gabby Giffords) [2]. The Wikipedia entry provides a comprehensive list of U.S. presidential assassination attempts and plots, detailing each incident, the victim’s political affiliation, and the assailant’s motives or affiliations [3]. The provided data lists specific incidents, including the assassination of Charlie Kirk (Conservative/Republican victim) by Tyler Robinson (killer affiliation unknown) [1], Melissa Hortman (Democrat victim) by Vance Boelter (killer affiliation possibly motivated by anti-Democrat sentiment) [1], and Donald Trump (Republican victim) by Thomas Matthew Crooks (20-year-old killer at the time of the crime) [1]. Experts, such as University of Chicago political scientist Robert Pape, note that violence has become a regular feature of American political life, and support for political violence has gone mainstream [1]. Additionally, Northeastern University criminologist James Alan Fox states that there's been a shift from expressing violence against the government as an entity to partisan individuals representing the opposing set of views [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The analyses highlight the need for a comprehensive historical catalog of all U.S. political assassination attempts, which is currently lacking [1]. The Wikipedia entry provides a list of U.S. presidential assassination attempts and plots but may not include all incidents of political violence [3]. The provided data focuses on recent incidents, such as the assassination of Charlie Kirk and the shooting of Donald Trump, but may not represent the full scope of US political assassination attempts [1]. University of Maryland researcher Michael Jensen notes that political violence is coming from everywhere, emphasizing the need to consider multiple perspectives and affiliations [5]. The role of social media in accelerating polarization and broadcasting extreme views is also mentioned as a factor contributing to the rise in political violence [5]. Furthermore, the analyses suggest that partisan individuals are increasingly becoming targets of violence, rather than just the government as an entity [4].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement requests a list of all US political assassination attempts, including the political affiliation of both the victim and the killer [1]. However, the provided analyses and data may not be exhaustive, and some sources may have partisan biases or limited perspectives [1] [2] [3]. For example, the PBS article and the KOAT piece focus on recent incidents, which may not provide a complete historical context [1] [2]. The Wikipedia entry, while comprehensive, may not include all incidents of political violence [3]. Experts, such as Robert Pape and James Alan Fox, provide valuable insights, but their statements may be influenced by their own perspectives and biases [1] [4]. The University of Maryland researcher Michael Jensen's statement that political violence is coming from everywhere highlights the need to consider multiple viewpoints and avoid partisan biases [5]. Overall, the original statement's request for a comprehensive list of US political assassination attempts may be challenging to fulfill due to the complexity and scope of the issue [1].