How many political figures have been assassinated in US history and what were their party affiliations?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Complete, authoritative counts of every U.S. political figure ever assassinated are not presented in the supplied sources; available reporting instead catalogs notable cases (including four presidents: Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley, Kennedy) and dozens of other targeted killings and attempts across U.S. history [1]. Recent reporting documents a sharp spike in politically motivated killings and attempts in 2024–2025 — including the murders of Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman and conservative activist Charlie Kirk — and shows both major parties have been victims of political violence [2] [3] [4].
1. What the sources actually list: presidents and notable political victims
The clearest, repeatedly cited fact in the material is that four U.S. presidents have been assassinated: Abraham Lincoln, James A. Garfield, William McKinley and John F. Kennedy — a historical anchor cited directly on lists of assassinated American politicians [1]. Beyond presidents, the sources compile many high‑profile cases across eras — from 19th‑ and early‑20th‑century state leaders to modern members of Congress and state legislators — but they do not deliver a single, definitive numeric total for “how many political figures” have been assassinated in U.S. history [1] [5].
2. Modern surge: more incidents, not a single tally
Multiple news outlets and analysts describe a surge of political violence in 2024–2025: assassination attempts on former President Trump, the December 2024 killing of a health‑care executive described as politically motivated, the June 2025 killings of Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, and the September 2025 assassination of conservative organizer Charlie Kirk [2] [3] [6] [4]. Reporting frames this as part of a broader uptick rather than as a resolved historical census — researchers and journalists count incidents, illustrate trends, and name victims, but do not consolidate every historical assassination into a single figure in the supplied material [6] [3].
3. Party affiliation: documented patterns and limits of the record
Where party affiliation is cited, the sources show victims from both major parties: the 14 members of Congress killed in office were mostly Democrats (10 Democrats, three Republicans, one Democratic‑Republican) according to a congressional‑members list, while recent victims include Democratic Minnesota legislators and Republican‑aligned figures such as Charlie Kirk and victims of the 2017 congressional baseball shooting [7] [2]. The reporting emphasizes that contemporary violence has targeted both Democrats and Republicans, and that motive and perpetrator political alignment are often unclear or contested [8] [6] [4].
4. Why you will not find a single “how many” number in these sources
The supplied sources are a mix of news timelines, encyclopedic lists and commentary; none publishes a comprehensive, authoritative count of every political assassination in U.S. history. They compile notable examples and partial lists — e.g., Wikipedia’s “List of assassinated American politicians” and a separate list of congressional members killed in office — but those pieces are not presented here as a unified total and the news reporting focuses on recent spikes and notable victims [1] [7] [2]. Therefore, the exact total across all local, state and national political actors is not provided in the material at hand (not found in current reporting).
5. What the available sources do provide that matters
The sources supply concrete, verifiable examples and trends: four presidents were killed [1]; 14 members of Congress have been killed while in office, with party breakdowns noted in the congressional list [7]; 2024–2025 saw several politically motivated killings and high‑profile assassination attempts, and analysts warn that political violence has risen to levels not seen since mid‑20th century [3] [6] [2]. They also include contemporaneous reactions and analyses tying increased polarization and rhetoric to higher risk of targeted violence [9] [6].
6. How to get the precise number you asked for (if you want it)
To produce a defensible numeric total you would need a systematic, source‑by‑source aggregation across national, state and local levels: authoritative databases (e.g., academic projects tracking political violence), federal records, historical compilations like the congressional lists, and rigorous cross‑verification of local historical records. The supplied sources do not perform that full aggregation and therefore cannot support a single, definitive count here (not found in current reporting).
Limitations and competing perspectives: the outlets cited present overlapping but not identical emphases — historical lists stress well‑documented historic cases [1], news organizations highlight current spikes and local victims [2] [6], and analysts and government statements warn of trends and policy implications [10] [11]. Some commentary frames recent events as asymmetric (more Democratic targets) while other reporting and official sources emphasize victims on both sides and motives that are often unclear [12] [4].