Which politicla party has caused more damage in the last 8 years

Checked on September 21, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Was this fact-check helpful?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided do not offer a clear consensus on which political party has caused more damage in the last 8 years [1] [2] [3]. Some sources suggest that the Republican Party's actions, particularly those of Donald Trump, have been divisive and contributed to the increase in political violence [1]. However, other sources note that the Democratic Party's failure to address underlying issues has also contributed to the current state of politics [1]. The rise in political violence is a significant concern, with over 300 cases reported since 2021 [2]. Additionally, the analyses highlight the importance of addressing the underlying causes of political violence, including social media, polarization, and the availability of guns [3]. In terms of party affiliation, some sources indicate a shift in party affiliation among Americans, with Democrats regaining an advantage, but also note that the Democratic Party's image is at an all-time low [4]. Other sources suggest that many Democrats see their own party as 'weak' or 'ineffective', which could imply that the Democratic Party has caused damage to itself [5]. The Republican Party is also viewed slightly more negatively overall, which could indicate that it has caused more damage [5]. Some sources provide information on the activities of the Bipartisan Policy Center, emphasizing the importance of bipartisanship [6], while others suggest that the Republican party, under Trump, has taken actions that could be seen as causing damage, such as eliminating federal funding for public broadcasting [7].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key missing context in the original statement is the definition of "damage" [1] [2] [3]. Different sources may have different interpretations of what constitutes damage, which could lead to varying conclusions. For example, some sources may consider the increase in political violence as a form of damage [2], while others may view the Democratic Party's failure to address underlying issues as a form of damage [1]. Additionally, the analyses provided do not consider the impact of external factors, such as social media and polarization, on the political landscape [3]. Alternative viewpoints, such as the perspective of independent voters or third-party candidates, are also not represented in the analyses [4] [5] [8]. Furthermore, the sources do not provide a comprehensive analysis of the policies and actions of both parties, which could help to determine which party has caused more damage [6] [7] [9]. Some sources highlight the importance of bipartisanship, which could be seen as a way to mitigate damage caused by partisan politics [6]. Others note that the Republican party, under Trump, has taken actions that could be seen as causing damage, such as eliminating federal funding for public broadcasting [7].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be biased towards assigning blame to one party, rather than considering the complexities of the political landscape [1] [2] [3]. The sources provided do not offer a clear consensus on which party has caused more damage, and some suggest that both parties have contributed to the current state of politics [1] [5]. Additionally, the statement does not consider the role of external factors, such as social media and polarization, in contributing to political violence and division [3]. The sources also highlight the importance of addressing the underlying causes of political violence, rather than simply assigning blame to one party [2] [3]. Some sources may benefit from a narrative that emphasizes the damage caused by one party, such as the Democratic Party's image being at an all-time low [4], or the Republican Party's actions being seen as divisive [1]. However, a more nuanced analysis that considers multiple perspectives and factors is necessary to provide an accurate assessment of which party has caused more damage [6] [7] [9]. The Bipartisan Policy Center's emphasis on bipartisanship could be seen as a way to promote a more balanced approach to addressing the political landscape [6].

Want to dive deeper?
What were the key policy decisions made by the Democratic party between 2016 and 2024?
How did the Republican party's tax cuts in 2017 affect the US economy?
Which party has been more effective in addressing climate change in the last 8 years?
What role did the 2020 US presidential election play in shaping the country's political landscape?
How have the approval ratings of the Democratic and Republican parties changed since 2016?