What political group in the United States incites more political violence?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided suggest that right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly than left-wing violence [1]. According to the data, right-wing extremist violence has been responsible for approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001, while left-wing extremist incidents have made up about 10% to 15% of incidents and less than 5% of fatalities [1]. Additionally, studies have shown that far-right extremists killed more than six times as many people in ideologically motivated attacks as far-left extremists since 1990 [2]. These findings contradict the claim that the left incites more political violence. President Trump's announcement to designate antifa as a 'major terrorist organization' may be an attempt to shift focus from right-wing violence [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key missing context in the original statement is the lack of definition of what constitutes "political violence". Different sources may have different definitions, which could lead to varying conclusions [4]. Furthermore, mental illness or incoherence may play a role in some violent incidents, making it complex to define the political motives of the perpetrator [4]. Alternative viewpoints, such as those presented by former President Barack Obama, emphasize the need to unite the country and recognize that there are 'extremists' on both sides of the aisle [5]. It is also important to consider that right-wing ideologies have fueled more than 70% of all extremist attacks and domestic terrorism plots in the United States since 2002 [6]. The decentralized nature of antifa and the president's lack of authority to designate domestic terrorist organizations also need to be taken into account [3].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading or biased as it does not provide a clear definition of "political violence" and does not account for the disproportionate amount of violence attributed to right-wing extremism [7] [1] [2]. President Trump and his allies may benefit from this framing, as it allows them to shift focus from right-wing violence and politicize incidents like the assassination of Charlie Kirk [3] [4]. On the other hand, left-wing groups and antifa may be unfairly targeted and stigmatized as a result of this narrative [3]. A more nuanced understanding of the issue, considering multiple sources and viewpoints, is necessary to accurately assess the situation [3] [4] [5] [7] [1] [2] [6].