Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Has any US president ever attempted to establish monarchical rule?

Checked on June 14, 2025

1. Summary of the results

While no U.S. president has successfully established a formal monarchical system, there have been significant historical instances related to monarchical rule in America. The most direct attempt came not from a president but from Colonel Lewis Nicola, who explicitly proposed to George Washington that he become the nation's monarch - a proposal Washington firmly rejected [1]. During the Constitutional Convention, there was even a serious proposal to offer the American crown to Prince Henry of Prussia, though this was later withdrawn [1].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several presidents have been accused of exhibiting monarchical tendencies throughout U.S. history:

  • Andrew Jackson was nicknamed "King Andrew the First" [2]
  • Theodore Roosevelt earned the moniker "Theodore Rex" [2]
  • Franklin D. Roosevelt's unprecedented four terms effectively made him president for life [2]
  • Barack Obama faced similar accusations during his presidency [2]

A crucial modern context is that recent developments in presidential power have intensified these concerns. Specifically, a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity has been criticized for potentially transforming the presidency into an "elective kingship" [3].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question oversimplifies a complex constitutional and historical issue. Multiple sources argue that the U.S. presidency has effectively functioned as an "elective monarchy" since its founding, with presidents wielding powers similar to monarchs [2]. This suggests that the distinction between presidential and monarchical power may be more nuanced than commonly understood.

The question of monarchical tendencies in the U.S. presidency benefits different groups in different ways:

  • Political opposition: Benefits from characterizing incumbent presidents as monarchical to criticize expansive executive power
  • Executive branch advocates: Benefit from defending strong presidential powers as necessary for effective governance
  • Constitutional scholars: Benefit from ongoing debates about the nature of executive power and its limitations
Want to dive deeper?
Which US presidents have been accused of authoritarian overreach during their terms?
What constitutional safeguards prevent US presidents from establishing permanent rule?
Has any US president ever tried to extend their term beyond constitutional limits?
What historical examples exist of democratic leaders attempting to become monarchs?
How do presidential emergency powers compare to monarchical authority in the United States?