Fact check: Which US President has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize the most times without winning?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the provided analyses, none of the sources contain sufficient information to answer the original question about which US President has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize the most times without winning.

The first source discusses "four U.S. presidents before Trump who weren't snubbed by the Nobel Prize committee," but the analysis indicates it does not provide specific nomination counts for presidents who didn't win ^[1]. The second source mentions that Donald Trump received a Nobel Peace Prize nomination that was later withdrawn, but fails to provide comparative data on multiple nominations or other presidents' nomination histories ^[2]. The third source appears completely irrelevant to the question, containing no information about US Presidents or the Nobel Peace Prize ^[3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The analyses reveal significant gaps in available information needed to properly address this question:

• No comprehensive data on nomination frequencies - None of the sources provide the specific nomination counts that would be necessary to determine which president holds the record for most nominations without winning
• Limited historical scope - The sources focus primarily on recent presidents like Trump rather than providing a comprehensive historical analysis of all US presidential Nobel nominations
• Lack of official nomination records - The Nobel Committee's nomination process involves confidentiality rules, and complete historical records may not be publicly accessible for comparison purposes
• Missing context on nomination criteria and processes - The sources don't explain how nominations work or why certain presidents might receive multiple nominations

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself assumes factual premises that may not be verifiable based on the available evidence:

• The question presupposes that complete nomination records exist and are publicly available for all US presidents, which may not be accurate given the Nobel Committee's confidentiality protocols
• It implies there is a clear "winner" in terms of most nominations without winning, when the available sources suggest this information may not be comprehensively documented or accessible ^{[1] [2] [3]}
• The framing could perpetuate speculation rather than factual reporting about Nobel Prize nominations, particularly given that nomination details are often kept confidential for 50 years according to Nobel Committee rules

The lack of substantive information across all three sources suggests that this question may not have a definitively answerable response based on publicly available records.