Fact check: Has any US president been accused of having monarchical tendencies?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided suggest that multiple US presidents have been accused of having monarchical tendencies ^{[1] [2]}. These accusations stem from various actions and decisions, such as attempts to subvert the electoral process, unilateral exercise of power, and disregard for checks and balances ^{[1] [3] [4]}. Specific examples include Donald Trump's actions, such as firing a member of the Federal Reserve Board ^[5], issuing executive orders that undermine civil rights and democracy ^[6], and claiming immunity from prosecution ^[7]. Other presidents, like Andrew Jackson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Franklin D. Roosevelt, have also been criticized for their assertive and determined behavior ^[2]. The concerns about monarchical tendencies are not new and have been present throughout US history, with some arguing that the presidency has been an elected kingship since 1776 ^[2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some key context missing from the original statement includes the historical context of the US presidency, which was designed to ensure no tyranny could be reproduced in the newly formed United States ^[2]. Additionally, the role of the Constitution in checking presidential power is crucial, as highlighted by the need for constitutional checks on presidential power ^[8]. Alternative viewpoints, such as the idea that presidents are necessary for effective governance, are not presented in the analyses ^[2]. The potential benefits of a strong presidency, such as the ability to respond quickly to crises, are also not discussed ^[6]. Furthermore, the impact of monarchical tendencies on different groups, such as marginalized communities, is not considered ^[7]. The beneficiaries of a monarchical system, including those who gain power and influence, are also not explicitly stated ^[4].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be biased towards a negative view of the US presidency, as it only asks about accusations of monarchical tendencies without considering the potential benefits of a strong presidency ^[1]. The sources cited may also have a liberal or progressive bias, as they often focus on the dangers of unchecked presidential power and the importance of constitutional checks ^{[8] [4]}. Additionally, some sources may be motivated by a desire to criticize Donald Trump, which could influence their analysis of his actions and decisions ^{[5] [7]}. The potential beneficiaries of this framing include those who oppose Trump and his policies, as well as those who gain from a more limited presidency ^[4]. Overall, the original statement and the analyses provided may be influenced by political motivations and biases, which could impact the accuracy and fairness of the information presented ^{[1] [7]}.