Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

What are the current stages or phases of voting regarding the US Senate Continuing Resolution as of Monday November 2025?

Checked on November 11, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive Summary

As of Monday, November 11, 2025 the reporting in the provided analyses shows disagreement about whether the Senate was in the middle of a multi-round voting sequence or had already advanced a compromise Continuing Resolution (CR) that met the 60‑vote threshold to move forward. Some accounts describe an active, fifth round of Senate voting still seeking votes; others say the Senate has already invoked cloture/advanced a bipartisan CR and the measure awaits final House passage and presidential signature [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. Why accounts diverge: conflicting snapshots of the same race against the clock

The analyses point to competing snapshots of the legislative process: one source frames the Senate as engaged in a fifth round of voting on a seven‑week CR, with some Democrats already crossing to join Republicans but the measure still pending a final tally [1]. Other pieces indicate the Senate had already advanced a compromise CR by securing the 60 votes needed to proceed, meaning the next fase would be House consideration and a presidential signature to enact funding [2] [3] [4]. These differences reflect the fast‑moving nature of shutdown negotiations: reports can diverge depending on whether they capture a procedural cloture vote, an advancement on the floor, or the ultimate passage vote, and the provided analyses do not consistently timestamp those stages [1] [2].

2. What “advanced” or “advanced to passage” means—and why it matters

Several analyses emphasize that the Senate’s action to “advance” a bill typically signifies meeting the 60‑vote threshold to overcome a filibuster and bring the CR to a final passage vote, not the end of the process [3] [4]. One source explicitly reports the Senate received 60 votes to advance a compromise, with a coalition of Democrats and almost all Republicans joining [4]. Another describes a step forward that would send the measure to the House for final passage and presidential signature [2]. The distinction between advancing and final passage matters because a CR can be procedurally cleared in the Senate yet still fail later in the House or be amended, prolonging the shutdown risk [2] [3].

3. The voting math and which senators shaped the outcome

One analysis reports that three Democrats—Sen. John Fetterman, Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, and Sen. Angus King—had voted with Republicans, leaving Republicans in need of additional Democratic support to reach 60 in a described fifth round of voting [1]. Other accounts note a coalition of Democrats joined Republicans to reach the 60‑vote threshold in a key advance vote, with reports citing eight Democrats crossing over in that instance [4]. These discrepancies underline how different tallies and vote counts were reported at different moments during the floor process; the critical fact is that bipartisan defections determined whether the Senate could invoke cloture and move the CR forward [1] [4].

4. House and presidential steps remain decisive despite Senate action

Multiple pieces emphasize that even after a Senate advance, the CR must still pass the House and be signed by the president to end the shutdown, and that House support was uncertain in light of missing elements such as healthcare subsidies requested by Democrats [2] [3]. One analysis explicitly says passage in the House was uncertain due to Democratic opposition stemming from omissions in the Senate compromise [3]. This shows the legislative sequence: Senate procedural victory does not guarantee an end to the shutdown unless the House concurs and the president signs the measure [2] [3].

5. What the sources indicate about timing and the quality of reporting

The provided analyses come from multiple briefings of the unfolding shutdown and use language like “planned to vote,” “advanced,” and “fifth round,” revealing real‑time reportage and differing editorial snapshots [5] [2] [1]. Some summaries lack explicit publication timestamps, which makes reconciling minute‑by‑minute statuses difficult [6] [2] [7]. Users should treat the differences as the product of sequential updates rather than outright contradictions: the Senate moved through several procedural votes in quick succession, and different outlets captured different moments of that arc [1] [4].

6. Bottom line for November 11, 2025: active process, not a single settled phase

Synthesizing the strands, the most defensible conclusion is that the Senate was in an active, transitional stage on or around November 11, 2025—either conducting a further round of votes to secure cloture or having just secured the 60‑vote advance—followed by the need for House passage and presidential signature to finalize funding [1] [3] [4]. The key unresolved questions in the analyses are whether the House would accept the Senate’s compromise and whether omitted policy items would spur renewed opposition; these procedural and political contingencies determine whether the CR’s advancement would actually end the shutdown [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What is a continuing resolution and why is it used in US Congress?
Key deadlines for federal funding in fiscal year 2026?
Who are the main Senate leaders negotiating the November 2025 CR?
Historical examples of Senate delays on continuing resolutions
Potential consequences of a government shutdown from failed CR in 2025