Fact check: Have any US state elections been canceled without voter input?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, no US state elections have been canceled without voter input, but there is a significant ongoing controversy at the municipal level. The Miami City Commission voted to cancel the November 2025 city election and move it to 2026, effectively extending the terms of current officials including the mayor ^{[1] [2] [3]}. This action was taken without direct voter approval and has sparked considerable controversy.

State officials have challenged Miami's authority to make this change without voter input, creating a legal dispute over whether the city has the power to unilaterally alter election schedules ^{[1] [3]}. The move has been characterized by critics as a "power grab" that extends incumbents' terms beyond their originally scheduled end dates ^[2].

The analyses also confirm that federal constitutional protections exist against election manipulation, with one source noting that the Constitution gives Congress and states the authority to set election dates, and debunking claims about federal officials having unilateral power to delay or cancel elections ^[4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question focuses specifically on state elections, but the most relevant current example involves a municipal election in Miami, which represents a different level of government ^{[1] [2] [3]}. This distinction is important because municipal elections may operate under different legal frameworks than state elections.

The analyses reveal competing interpretations of legal authority: Miami city officials believe they have the right to reschedule elections, while state officials argue that such changes require voter approval ^{[1] [3]}. This suggests there may be genuine legal ambiguity rather than clear-cut wrongdoing.

Current Miami officials, including the mayor, would directly benefit from the election postponement as it extends their terms in office ^[2]. However, the analyses don't provide the city's official justification for the change, which could include legitimate administrative or cost-saving reasons.

The broader context of voter suppression efforts mentioned in some analyses ^{[5] [6]} suggests this Miami case exists within a larger national conversation about election integrity and access, though these sources don't directly address election cancellations.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains no apparent misinformation or bias - it asks a straightforward factual question about whether US state elections have been canceled without voter input. The question is appropriately specific in asking about state elections rather than making broader claims about election manipulation.

However, the question's framing might inadvertently exclude relevant municipal-level examples like the Miami case, which could be seen as the closest real-world parallel to the scenario described ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Someone asking this question might benefit from understanding that while state elections haven't been canceled without voter input, similar controversies have occurred at the local level.

The analyses also reveal that false claims about election cancellation powers have circulated, with one source specifically debunking viral graphics claiming federal officials could delay or cancel elections ^[4], suggesting this topic is susceptible to misinformation.