Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How many states have introduced or passed anti-sharia law bills since 2010?
Executive Summary
The materials provided do not establish a definitive count of U.S. states that have introduced or passed anti‑Sharia measures since 2010; the dossier documents Oklahoma’s 2010 constitutional ban and Texas’s 2025 statute as concrete, dated examples, and several recent federal bills that echo state-level concerns [1] [2] [3] [4]. No source in the package offers a comprehensive tally or an authoritative survey of state legislative activity nationwide, so a precise numeric answer cannot be derived from the supplied items alone [5] [6].
1. What the supplied records claim — specific state actions that stand out
The most clearly documented state-level action in the materials is Oklahoma’s 2010 vote forbidding state courts from considering Islamic Sharia or international law in decisions; that constitutional amendment is repeatedly cited as a tangible anti‑Sharia measure [1] [2]. The package also records a Texas law signed in 2025 banning so‑called “Sharia compounds” and provisions described as preventing imposition of Sharia‑based housing practices, representing a modern legislative embodiment of anti‑Sharia intent [3]. These two items are the primary state examples present in the dossier.
2. Federal initiatives mirror and amplify state-level rhetoric
Multiple entries show recent federal proposals invoking “no Sharia” language, including Representative Chip Roy’s Preserving A Sharia‑Free America Act and the No Sharia Act introduced by Senators Cornyn and Tuberville, which aim to restrict application or presence of Sharia-related practices at national borders or under federal law [4] [7]. These federal bills do not enumerate states that have adopted anti‑Sharia measures; instead they indicate a political pattern in Washington that parallels some state actions and can influence state-level rhetoric and lawmaking [4] [7].
3. Gaps and silences in the provided evidence — why a count is impossible here
The supplied sources include three items that are explicitly irrelevant or are privacy/cookie notices, indicating incomplete or noisy data in the collection and underscoring the absence of a comprehensive dataset [5] [6]. Nowhere in the package is there a legislative inventory, nonpartisan summary, or academic survey tallying how many states have introduced or enacted anti‑Sharia measures since 2010. Therefore, no reliable statewide count can be extracted solely from these materials.
4. Conflicting emphases and potential advocacy signals in the sources
The entries vary in tone and purpose: state ballot reporting (Oklahoma) and a governor’s signing (Texas) are factual accounts of government action [1] [2] [3], while federal bills with ideologically charged titles signal political advocacy and agenda-setting [4] [7]. The presence of privacy or unrelated pages in the dataset suggests selection bias or incomplete curation, which can skew conclusions about prevalence if relied on without broader corroboration [5] [6].
5. What a careful, evidence‑based approach would require beyond these items
To answer “how many states” definitively, one needs a systematic review of state legislative records, ballot measures, and court challenges from 2010 to date, or a compiled database from a neutral research body. The provided items point to examples and patterns but do not substitute for such a survey. The current dossier therefore supports illustrative claims (Oklahoma 2010, Texas 2025) but not a comprehensive numeric conclusion [1] [2] [3].
6. How political context in the items shapes interpretation and public debate
The documents demonstrate that anti‑Sharia measures have surfaced in both ballot initiatives and legislative statutes and are sometimes paired with federal proposals targeting Sharia practice or presence, which indicates a multi‑level political effort rather than isolated local ordinances [1] [2] [3] [4]. Observing that federal bills and state laws share language and goals suggests coordinated messaging; readers should note that such alignment can reflect shared political agendas as much as independent local concerns [4] [7].
7. Bottom line and recommended next steps for a precise answer
Based only on the supplied materials, the verifiable count is two states explicitly documented: Oklahoma (2010 constitutional ban) and Texas (2025 statute) — but the dataset is insufficient to claim that these are the only or the total number of states with anti‑Sharia proposals [1] [2] [3]. For a definitive, up‑to‑date tally, compile legislative records across all 50 states and consult nonpartisan legal trackers or academic studies; without those, any numeric claim would be unsupported by the provided evidence.