Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How many times have us states had a mid cycle redistricting
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, none of the sources offer a specific numerical count of how many times US states have conducted mid-cycle redistricting. However, the sources consistently characterize mid-cycle redistricting as unusual and rare [1] [2] [3]. The analyses reveal that redistricting typically occurs once a decade after the census [1] [3], making mid-decade redistricting departures from standard practice.
The sources highlight Texas Republicans as taking the rare step of drawing new maps in the middle of the decade [4], with one analysis noting that Republicans are undertaking a rare mid-decade redistricting for partisan reasons [3]. Additionally, Republican lawmaker Rep. Kevin Kiley of California introduced a bill to ban mid-decade redrawing of congressional maps nationwide, suggesting that such practices are not common or widely accepted [5].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks crucial context about the political motivations and strategic implications of mid-cycle redistricting. The analyses reveal that:
- Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee president Heather Williams suggests that Democratic state legislatures should pursue redistricting mid-cycle as a strategic move to "protect their democracy" [4]
- Some Democrats have alleged that Texas GOP efforts are racially motivated and may pursue litigation under the Voting Rights Act [5]
- The practice appears to be part of an escalating political battle between parties [1] [2]
The question also misses the legal and procedural framework - redistricting battles often involve court interventions and legal challenges, with potential implications for upcoming elections like the 2026 midterms [6].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question itself does not contain misinformation, as it's a straightforward factual inquiry. However, the lack of available specific numerical data in the sources suggests that comprehensive tracking of mid-cycle redistricting instances may not be readily accessible or systematically documented.
The analyses indicate potential bias in how different political actors frame mid-cycle redistricting:
- Republicans characterize it as necessary redistricting
- Democrats frame it as partisan gerrymandering or racially motivated manipulation [5]
The question's neutral framing actually avoids the partisan characterizations present in the political discourse surrounding this issue, though it may inadvertently suggest that mid-cycle redistricting is more common than the sources indicate it actually is.