Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: The US halted funding to the UNRWA and is unlikely to restart it following the inagoration of Trump.
1. Summary of the results
The original statement contains several inaccuracies and oversimplifications. The US did halt funding to UNRWA, but this occurred in January/February 2024 as part of a broader international response to allegations of UNRWA staff involvement in the October 7 attacks [1]. This is separate from a previous funding halt during Trump's first presidency in 2018 [2]. The current suspension is part of a larger international response, with 16 donor countries suspending approximately $440 million in total funding [1].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original statement:
- The current funding suspension is part of a broader international response, not just a US action. For example, Sweden has also stopped its funding in 2025 [3]
- An independent UN review is currently ongoing, with an interim report expected in late March and a final public report by late April 2024 [1]
- The suspension is specifically tied to allegations about UNRWA staff involvement in the October 7 attacks, not to political transitions [1]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The statement contains several problematic elements:
- It incorrectly links the funding halt to Trump's inauguration, when in fact it occurred earlier and for different reasons [1]
- It fails to distinguish between the 2018 Trump-era funding halt [2] and the current 2024 suspension
- It oversimplifies a complex international situation by focusing solely on US actions, when multiple countries are involved [1]
The framing of this issue as purely political (tied to Trump) rather than as a response to specific allegations benefits those who want to portray it as a partisan issue rather than acknowledging the complex international security and accountability concerns at play.