Fact check: Will USA invade Brasil to save Bolsonaro?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, there is no evidence whatsoever that the USA plans to invade Brazil to save Bolsonaro. The sources reveal a complex diplomatic situation but no military intervention plans:

• The US State Department has condemned Brazil's Supreme Court order for Bolsonaro's house arrest ^{[1] [2]}
• The Trump administration has imposed tariffs on Brazil and sanctioned a Brazilian justice in response to Bolsonaro's prosecution ^[3]
• Sources document the storming of Brazilian government buildings by Bolsonaro supporters, drawing parallels to the US Capitol riot ^{[4] [5]}
• Historical context shows the US previously planned to invade northeastern Brazil during World War II, but abandoned the plan due to diplomacy ^[6]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial context about the actual US response to Bolsonaro's legal troubles:

• Economic pressure instead of military action: The US has chosen to use tariffs and sanctions as diplomatic tools rather than military intervention ^[3]
• Legal risks Bolsonaro faces: Sources indicate Bolsonaro faces significant legal challenges in Brazil and potential implications for his stay in the US ^[5]
• Connections between political movements: There are documented ties between Bolsonaro's allies and Trump's supporters, which influenced the Brazilian Congress attack ^[4]
• Diplomatic criticism vs. military action: While the US has criticized Brazil's judicial decisions, this represents standard diplomatic protest, not preparation for invasion ^{[1] [2]}

Beneficiaries of invasion speculation:

• Political extremists who benefit from escalating tensions between the US and Brazil
• Media outlets that gain attention from sensationalized geopolitical speculation
• Bolsonaro supporters who might use such narratives to portray him as internationally significant

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains several problematic assumptions:

• False premise: It assumes the US would consider military invasion as a viable option to "save" a foreign political figure, which contradicts established diplomatic norms
• Sensationalized framing: The question uses inflammatory language ("invade") without basis in the available evidence
• Ignores actual US response: The question overlooks the documented US actions (diplomatic criticism, economic measures) that represent the actual American approach ^{[1] [3]}
• Historical misunderstanding: While the US did plan a Brazilian invasion during WWII, that was abandoned through diplomacy and bears no relation to current events ^[6]

The question appears designed to generate speculation rather than seek factual information about US-Brazil relations regarding Bolsonaro's legal situation.