Does more violence come from the right or the left in the USA
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The majority of the analyses suggest that right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly than left-wing violence in the USA, with sources such as [1], [2], [3], [1], [1], and [3] providing data to support this claim [1] [2] [3]. For example, [1] states that right-wing attacks account for the vast majority of fatalities from domestic terrorism [1]. Similarly, [1] cites data showing that approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001 were caused by right-wing extremist violence [1]. However, some sources, such as [4] and [4], note that assessing political violence in America is inherently subjective and that available datasets may be biased, making it difficult to determine whether 'radical-left' violence is really on the rise in America [4].
- Key findings from the analyses include:
Right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly than left-wing violence [1] [2] [3]
The overall number of politically motivated murders is relatively small, accounting for about 0.35% of all murders since 1975 [2]
Assessing political violence in America is inherently subjective and available datasets may be biased [4]
The majority of Americans say it's always or usually unacceptable to be happy about the death of a public figure they oppose [5]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Some sources, such as [4] and [4], suggest that the killing of Charlie Kirk is not representative of broader trends in radical-left violence [4]. Additionally, [5] provides polling data that shows younger Americans and liberals are more likely to defend feeling joy about the deaths of political opponents, but still, the majority say it's unacceptable [5]. These alternative viewpoints highlight the complexity of the issue and the need for a nuanced understanding of political violence in America.
- Alternative viewpoints include:
The killing of Charlie Kirk is not representative of broader trends in radical-left violence [4]
Younger Americans and liberals are more likely to defend feeling joy about the deaths of political opponents [5]
The majority of Americans say it's always or usually unacceptable to be happy about the death of a public figure they oppose [5]
**3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement**
The original statement **does not provide any context or evidence** to support its claim, which could lead to misinformation and bias [1] [2] [3]. Furthermore, some sources, such as [3] and [3], suggest that **President Trump's claims that the left is more violent are not supported by data** [3]. This highlights the potential for **political bias and misinformation** in the original statement.
Potential biases and misinformation include:
The original statement does not provide any context or evidence to support its claim [1] [2] [3]
President Trump's claims that the left is more violent are not supported by data [3]
- The potential for political bias and misinformation in the original statement [3]