Does more violence come from the right or the left in the USA

Checked on September 21, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Was this fact-check helpful?

1. Summary of the results

The majority of the analyses suggest that right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly than left-wing violence in the USA, with sources such as [1], [2], [3], [1], [1], and [3] providing data to support this claim [1] [2] [3]. For example, [1] states that right-wing attacks account for the vast majority of fatalities from domestic terrorism [1]. Similarly, [1] cites data showing that approximately 75% to 80% of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001 were caused by right-wing extremist violence [1]. However, some sources, such as [4] and [4], note that assessing political violence in America is inherently subjective and that available datasets may be biased, making it difficult to determine whether 'radical-left' violence is really on the rise in America [4].

  • Key findings from the analyses include:

Right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly than left-wing violence [1] [2] [3]

The overall number of politically motivated murders is relatively small, accounting for about 0.35% of all murders since 1975 [2]

Assessing political violence in America is inherently subjective and available datasets may be biased [4]

The majority of Americans say it's always or usually unacceptable to be happy about the death of a public figure they oppose [5]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some sources, such as [4] and [4], suggest that the killing of Charlie Kirk is not representative of broader trends in radical-left violence [4]. Additionally, [5] provides polling data that shows younger Americans and liberals are more likely to defend feeling joy about the deaths of political opponents, but still, the majority say it's unacceptable [5]. These alternative viewpoints highlight the complexity of the issue and the need for a nuanced understanding of political violence in America.

  • Alternative viewpoints include:

The killing of Charlie Kirk is not representative of broader trends in radical-left violence [4]

Younger Americans and liberals are more likely to defend feeling joy about the deaths of political opponents [5]

The majority of Americans say it's always or usually unacceptable to be happy about the death of a public figure they oppose [5]

**3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement**

The original statement **does not provide any context or evidence** to support its claim, which could lead to misinformation and bias [1] [2] [3]. Furthermore, some sources, such as [3] and [3], suggest that **President Trump's claims that the left is more violent are not supported by data** [3]. This highlights the potential for **political bias and misinformation** in the original statement.

Potential biases and misinformation include:

The original statement does not provide any context or evidence to support its claim [1] [2] [3]

President Trump's claims that the left is more violent are not supported by data [3]

  • The potential for political bias and misinformation in the original statement [3]
Want to dive deeper?
What are the most notable instances of right-wing violence in the USA since 2020?
How does the FBI classify and track domestic terrorism from left and right-wing groups?
What is the correlation between political polarization and violence in the USA since 2016?
Can social media platforms be held accountable for spreading hate speech that leads to violence?
How do law enforcement agencies differentiate between left and right-wing extremist groups in the USA?