Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What is the USCIS deferred action program for medical cases and how did it change under Trump?
1. Summary of the results
The USCIS medical deferred action program was a discretionary immigration relief that allowed individuals with severe medical conditions to temporarily stay in the US for treatment unavailable in their home countries, including work authorization [1]. In August 2019, under the Trump administration, USCIS abruptly terminated the program [2], sending letters to immigrants giving them 33 days to leave the country [3]. The program previously allowed two-year stays for critical treatment [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several crucial details provide important context:
- The program specifically helped patients with life-threatening conditions like cystic fibrosis, cancer, cerebral palsy, and muscular dystrophy [2] [4]
- After the termination, cases were to be redirected to ICE rather than being handled by USCIS [4]
- The ACLU filed a lawsuit challenging the decision, arguing it was racially motivated and arbitrary [2]
- Due to widespread public condemnation and advocacy efforts, the Trump administration eventually reversed course [5]
- While the program was reinstated for cases pending as of August 7, no new applications would be accepted [3]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question doesn't capture several important aspects:
- The temporary nature of the program - it was never meant to provide permanent immigration status [1]
- The human impact - families like the Sanchez family faced potential life-threatening consequences if deported [4]
- The discretionary nature of the program - even after reinstatement, approval was not guaranteed [5]
Those benefiting from strict enforcement would support the termination (ICE, immigration hardliners), while medical institutions, human rights organizations (like ACLU), and affected families would advocate for the program's continuation.