Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Is the rumor between Bill clinton and Trump true?
Executive summary
A cache of Jeffrey Epstein emails released in November 2025 includes an exchange where Mark Epstein writes, “Ask him if Putin has the photos of Trump blowing Bubba,” which sparked an online rumor that a photo exists of Donald Trump performing oral sex on “Bubba” (widely inferred to mean Bill Clinton) [1]. The email’s authenticity is reported by multiple outlets, while Mark Epstein and others have disputed that “Bubba” refers to Clinton; mainstream outlets and fact-checkers note the line is ambiguous and do not confirm any photo or sexual encounter [2] [3] [1].
1. What the released emails actually show — the factual core
The House Oversight Committee released thousands of pages of Epstein-related emails; among them a March 2018 message from Mark Epstein to Jeffrey Epstein saying, “Ask him if Putin has the photos of Trump blowing Bubba,” which has been verified as authentic in reporting cited by NBC and Snopes, and summarized in coverage of the release [1] [2]. Reporting and archival coverage confirm that the snippet exists in the released material; the line triggered speculation because it names Putin, Trump and the nickname “Bubba” [1] [2].
2. Why many people jumped to “Trump blew Bubba = Trump blew Bill Clinton”
Internet users connected “Bubba” to Bill Clinton because Clinton appears in Epstein records and has previously been referred to as “Bubba” in other documents; Know Your Meme and other trackers documented how users repeatedly linked the nickname to Clinton and circulated memes and posts treating the email as corroboration [2] [4]. The email’s wording, plus preexisting intrigue about Epstein’s files and Putin’s rumored leverage, created viral momentum that turned a one-line query into an explosive rumor [1].
3. Key limitations in the record — what the sources do not confirm
Available reporting does not confirm that the alleged photo exists, nor does it establish that “Bubba” in the email is Bill Clinton or that Trump engaged in the act described. Mark Epstein has publicly said the “Bubba” reference was a private joke not referring to Bill Clinton, and outlets note the ambiguity and lack of corroborating evidence for any compromising image or encounter [3] [2]. Fact-checking coverage and mainstream outlets emphasize the line is suggestive but not proof of wrongdoing or a specific sexual act [1] [2].
4. Contradictory statements and alternative explanations
Mark Epstein’s statement that “Bubba” was not Bill Clinton directly challenges the viral interpretation, and reporting highlights that the email could be rhetorical, sarcastic, or speculative rather than a factual report of an existing photo [3] [1]. Some sources frame the exchange as part of broader, politically charged efforts to compel release of “Epstein files”; others treat it as an unverified, meme-ready provocation rather than evidence [4] [5].
5. How major outlets and institutions have reacted
News organizations from Reuters to CNN, NPR and international outlets have covered the wider political fallout: President Trump publicly called for DOJ and FBI probes into Epstein’s ties to political figures including Bill Clinton, partly in response to the email releases, but those calls do not equate to confirmation of the rumor itself [6] [7] [8]. Coverage stresses that Clinton has denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes and that flight logs and other public records have been scrutinized without producing confirmation of the specific rumor [9].
6. The political context and incentives shaping the story
Reporting notes clear political incentives: Trump pushed investigations into Epstein’s ties to Democrats as the new emails circulated, a move observers described as deflecting scrutiny of his own prior relationship with Epstein [5] [10]. Conversely, Clinton’s team has emphasized the emails “prove Bill Clinton did nothing and knew nothing,” framing the same materials as exculpatory [11] [7]. Both sides have motives to amplify narratives that either damage or defend reputations.
7. Bottom line for readers seeking truth about the rumor
The primary fact in published sources is that an authentic email asks whether Putin “has the photos of Trump blowing Bubba” [1] [2]. Available reporting does not establish who “Bubba” definitively is, whether a photo exists, or that the alleged sexual act occurred; Mark Epstein has denied the email referred to Bill Clinton [3]. The claim remains an unproven, explosive inference built on one ambiguous line amid a politically charged document dump [2] [1].
If you want, I can compile the exact email text and the timeline of the House Oversight release, plus links to the Mark Epstein statement and mainstream fact-checks so you can review the primary snippets yourself.