Which victims have publicly accused Trump of involvement with Epstein and what did they say under oath?

1. What the court testimony shows: survivors who mentioned Trump did not accuse him of wrongdoing

Among the handful of survivors who testified in open court related to Epstein and Maxwell, reporting identifies at least one witness who said she met Donald Trump as a teenager but did not accuse him of sexual misconduct; that witness testified at Maxwell’s trial, described meeting Epstein, Maxwell and Trump but did not allege inappropriate behavior by Trump under oath ^[3].

2. Documents and interview notes that name Trump are not the same as sworn accusations

The newly released Justice Department materials include handwritten FBI interview notes and emailed tips that reference Trump and allege he was present with a victim at Epstein’s house, but press outlets and officials emphasize that those items are unverified leads, tips or Epstein’s own writings rather than sworn, court-submitted victim testimony accusing Trump of crimes ^{[4] [5] [6]}.

3. Epstein’s private emails and third‑party tips: suggestive but not judicial proof

Jeffrey Epstein’s contemporaneous emails — for example the 2011 message calling Trump “the dog that hasn’t barked” and referencing that a victim “spent hours at my house with him” — have been publicized by congressional and media releases, but those are Epstein’s statements or screenshots of tips and do not by themselves establish a victim’s sworn allegation against Trump ^{[5] [6] [7]}.

4. Justice Department and prosecutors’ posture: no credible lead to prosecute Trump found in files released so far

Following the document dump, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told reporters the DOJ looked into allegations connecting Trump to Epstein and “did not find credible information to merit further investigation,” and DOJ officials have said the released materials do not show criminal conduct by Trump ^{[2] [8]}. Multiple outlets reporting on the release likewise note that the documents reveal references and unverified tips but not proven criminal acts by Trump ^{[4] [9]}.

5. Survivors’ advocacy groups and victims’ public statements: anger about redactions, not new sworn accusations

Survivor groups and prominent accusers have criticized the Justice Department for releasing files that expose victims while (they say) leaving powerful men unnamed or redacted; that outrage centers on privacy and transparency rather than new under‑oath accusations against Trump in the public record ^{[1] [7] [10]}.

6. Competing narratives, political incentives, and evidentiary limits

Political actors have incentives to amplify or downplay links between Trump and Epstein: some Republicans have pushed focus onto the Clintons, while Democrats and investigators press for unredacted victim statements; reporters caution that released files contain unverified tips, Epstein’s own allegations, and redaction errors, meaning interpretation is fraught and prosecutorial thresholds are higher than public innuendo ^{[11] [12] [7]}. Media reviews — NPR and others — flag numerous redaction failures and the difference between naming someone in a file and having a sworn, corroborated victim accusation ^[10].

7. Bottom line and limits of available reporting

Based on the sources provided, no identified Epstein victim has publicly accused Donald Trump under oath of sexual abuse or trafficking tied to Epstein; some survivors mentioned meeting Trump without alleging misconduct ^[3], and the released files contain unverified tips, Epstein’s own messages, and interview notes that reference Trump but do not constitute sworn victim testimony accusing him — a distinction emphasized by the DOJ and multiple news organizations ^{[2] [5] [4]}. If additional unredacted victim interview statements exist, they were not available in the reporting provided and thus cannot be confirmed here ^{[7] [10]}.