Violence rates by political party
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided present a complex picture of violence rates by political party in the United States. According to a YouGov survey, 72% of Americans believe that violence is never justified, while 11% believe it can sometimes be justified to achieve political goals [1]. The survey also found that liberals are more likely than conservatives to say that violence can sometimes be justified, with 25% of very liberal respondents and 17% of liberal respondents holding this view [1]. However, another analysis suggests that right-wing extremist violence has been more frequent and deadly than left-wing violence in recent years, accounting for approximately 75-80% of US domestic terrorism deaths since 2001 [2]. This is supported by another source, which notes that the majority of domestic terrorists in the US are politically on the right [2]. A poll reported by The Hill found that 26% of liberals under 45 years old and 12% of liberals 45 and older believe that political violence is sometimes justified [3]. On the other hand, data shows that right-wing ideology is responsible for the majority of politically motivated murders [4]. Additionally, a YouGov poll found that 87% of Americans say political violence is a problem, with 59% saying it is a very big problem [1].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Some key context that is missing from the original statement is the fact that politically motivated violence is rare in the US, accounting for only 0.35% of all murders since 1975 [5]. Another alternative viewpoint is that the threat from politically motivated violence is relatively small, with right-wing terrorists responsible for 11% of murders in terrorist attacks, and left-wing terrorists responsible for 2% [5]. Furthermore, the demand for political violence exceeds the supply, with the public demanding more politically motivated violence than murderers are willing to supply [5]. It is also important to note that both Democrats and Republicans have been targeted in recent political violence [6].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement about violence rates by political party may be misleading, as it does not provide a clear picture of the complexity of the issue. The statement may benefit those who want to portray one side of the political spectrum as more violent than the other, without considering the nuances of the issue [1] [2] [3]. Additionally, the statement may be influenced by bias in the media, with some sources presenting data that shows right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and deadly than left-wing violence [2] [4]. On the other hand, other sources may be presenting data that shows liberals are more likely to say that political violence is sometimes justified [1] [3]. It is essential to consider multiple sources and viewpoints to get a comprehensive understanding of the issue [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [5].