What votes are required in the House and Senate to remove a president during an emergency?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Impeachment is the constitutional mechanism Congress uses to remove a president: the House adopts articles of impeachment by a simple majority, and the Senate convicts (and thereby removes) only with a two‑thirds vote of senators present; there is no separate, elevated threshold tied to a national emergency in the Constitution or the authoritative guides reviewed here [1] [2] [3]. Where the record is murkier, it shows procedural variations in practice—committee inquiries, rules about who presides, and a separate simple‑majority vote to disqualify from future office—but no different numeric votes that apply “during an emergency” [4] [5] [6].
1. The House: one chamber, one simple‑majority gate
The Constitution vests the House of Representatives with the “sole Power of Impeachment,” and Congress’s plain practice is that each article of impeachment approved by the full House requires only a simple majority to pass—this is the formal act that “impeaches” the official and moves the matter to the Senate [1] [7] [8]. In practice the House often routes inquiries through committees—most frequently the Judiciary Committee—which may vote to recommend articles, but such committee votes are procedural steps, not constitutional prerequisites, and the full House vote is the decisive one [4] [7]. The sources also show that in recent practice a House may begin inquiries without a separate authorization vote of the entire chamber, underscoring that procedure, not a supermajority threshold, governs the House phase [6].
2. The Senate: two‑thirds to convict, removal follows
When the House transmits articles, the Senate “sits as a High Court of Impeachment,” holds a trial, and conviction requires a two‑thirds vote of the senators present—a supermajority built into Article I of the Constitution; conviction carries the penalty of removal from office [2] [3] [4]. For presidential trials the Chief Justice of the United States presides over the Senate trial, a unique constitutional requirement that frames the chamber’s deliberations [2] [5]. Senate rules and precedent can affect trial procedure—who speaks, what evidence is allowed, and whether deliberations are public or closed—but they do not change the two‑thirds constitutional standard for conviction and removal [5] [4].
3. Disqualification and ancillary votes
If the Senate convicts, it may also hold a separate vote to bar the convicted individual from holding future federal office; historical practice and authoritative summaries indicate that this disqualification vote requires only a simple majority, not the two‑thirds threshold used for conviction [4] [6]. The Constitution also makes clear that impeachment and conviction do not preclude subsequent criminal prosecution in the courts, and that the president’s pardon power does not extend to removing congressional authority over impeachment [3].
4. “During an emergency”: no altered arithmetic in the sources
None of the provided constitutional analyses, Senate guidance, or authoritative summaries identify any distinct impeachment vote counts or lowered/raised thresholds that apply specifically in a declared national emergency; the House’s simple majority and the Senate’s two‑thirds rules are stated as the governing standards regardless of circumstances [1] [2] [3]. That absence in the record means any claim that emergency powers or crisis status change the numeric requirements for impeachment and removal lacks support in these official and scholarly sources; reporting and legal commentary instead focus on procedural timing and political context rather than different vote thresholds [5] [6].
5. Politics, standards, and limits of the record
The constitutional votes are clear, but what counts as “impeachable” conduct is intentionally broad and has been litigated in the court of public opinion and through partisan politics—scholars and senators have long observed that “high crimes and misdemeanors” lack a fixed legal definition and that political judgments often shape outcomes, meaning that the vote totals reflect political coalitions as much as legal thresholds [3] [9]. The sources document that Senate procedural rules can influence how a trial unfolds and that House practices around inquiries vary, but they do not provide any legal basis for changing the simple‑majority and two‑thirds vote requirements during emergencies [5] [4]. Where the sources are silent—such as hypothetical emergency statutes or executive acts claiming to alter impeachment voting—no factual assertion about their validity can be made from these materials alone.