Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How did funding for undocumented immigrant healthcare in Washington change in the 2019–2024 biennium budgets?
Executive Summary
Washington shifted from little or no dedicated state funding for undocumented‑immigrant healthcare in the 2019–2020 biennium to substantial, explicit appropriations by 2024, culminating in a broadly reported allocation of about $150 million to launch a Medicaid‑style Apple Health Expansion and supplemental operating proposals that included $35 million for immigrant support in the 2023–2025 package [1] [2] [3]. Contemporary budget discussions in 2024–2025 describe ongoing annualized funding levels around $76.8 million with House and Senate proposals varying between roughly $64.6 million and $76.8 million, signaling a consolidation of funding after incremental increases since 2019 [4] [5]. This analysis collates those reported figures, traces the trajectory across biennia, and highlights where sources document clear amounts versus where gaps remain.
1. How budget lines went from marginal to explicit — a funding trajectory that matters
Washington’s 2019–2020 biennium shows little or no dedicated line‑item funding for healthcare for undocumented immigrants according to state budget summaries and contemporaneous reporting, with funding only beginning to appear in modest amounts in subsequent biennia [2] [5]. The 2021–2022 biennium introduced modest appropriations and the 2022–2024 biennium added additional millions, but the most significant shift appears in the 2023–2025 supplemental proposals and the 2024 legislative session, when lawmakers earmarked larger sums specifically for immigrant healthcare and supports [2] [5]. Reporting underscores that the change was both programmatic — authorizing Apple Health‑style coverage for undocumented adults — and fiscal, moving from scattered or minimal supports into explicit multi‑million dollar allocations [3] [1]. The pattern shows a clear upward trajectory rather than a roll‑back.
2. The headline numbers: $150M, $76.8M, and the $35M supplemental
Multiple reports converge on two headline figures for the most recent budget actions: a roughly $150 million allocation tied to the initial Apple Health Expansion launch and advertised two‑year funding needs, and an annualized program funding level often reported near $76.8 million in the 2024–2025 budget context [1] [4]. In addition, a 2024 House Democratic supplemental operating proposal explicitly earmarked $35 million for immigrant, refugee, asylee, and undocumented support, which advocates and budget summaries cited as the largest single line‑item to date for those populations [2]. Reporting distinguishes the $150 million as a two‑year package associated with the new program launch while the $76.8 million figure is used by several outlets and policy summaries as a recurring annual baseline, and the $35 million sits inside a broader supplemental package [1] [4] [2].
3. Where sources agree and where they conflict — parsing annual vs. biennial figures
Sources agree that funding increased substantially between 2019 and 2024, but they differ in how totals are presented: some outlets report a two‑year total of around $150 million for the Apple Health Expansion, while others frame recurring funding as approximately $76.8 million per year and legislative proposals show variance across chambers with Senate proposals lower than House figures [1] [4] [5]. The supplemental $35 million figure is presented as a discrete appropriation in a 2024 proposal focused on immigrant supports, and that number is not directly additive to every reporting of the $76.8 million or $150 million totals because of different accounting conventions [2] [4]. This divergence arises from differences in scope (program launch vs. annual maintenance) and accounting (supplemental vs. base budget) rather than outright contradiction in the fact of increased funding.
4. Missing pieces and reporting limitations you should note
Contemporary reporting provides clear end‑state numbers for 2024 program launch funding and 2024–2025 proposals but leaves gaps in granular year‑by‑year appropriations across 2019–2022; few sources publish a line‑by‑line comparison of each biennium showing exact dollar‑for‑dollar changes from 2019 through 2024 [6] [7] [8]. Several summaries state that 2019–2020 had minimal or no targeted funding and that later biennia introduced modest then larger appropriations, but the precise annual totals for 2021–2022 and 2022–2024 are often summarized qualitatively rather than enumerated, limiting direct arithmetic comparisons without consulting official budget tables [2] [7]. For rigorous accounting, legislative budget documents and the Health Care Authority’s appropriations schedules are the primary records not fully reproduced in the reporting analyzed here.
5. Bottom line for readers tracking policy and politics
The verified record in these reports shows a clear policy and fiscal shift: Washington moved from minimal or no dedicated funding in 2019–2020 to explicit, multi‑million dollar appropriations by 2024, anchored by a two‑year Apple Health Expansion cost basis cited near $150 million and recurring funding levels reported near $76.8 million, supplemented by targeted appropriations such as a $35 million proposal in 2024 [1] [4] [2]. Where numbers differ, the variation reflects different budgeting frames (biennial vs. annual vs. supplemental) and chamber proposals, not a dispute about whether funding increased. For definitive year‑by‑year dollar comparisons, consult the state’s enacted biennial budget tables and Health Care Authority appropriation schedules to reconcile biennial totals.