Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

What is the content of Hillary Clinton's email mentioning Jeffrey Epstein?

Checked on November 16, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Available reporting shows at least one Epstein email mentioning Hillary Clinton that surfaced among the newly released Epstein files; the email contains a cryptic line — “hillary doing naughties with vince” — attributed to Jeffrey Epstein in a May 25, 2016 message and has been amplified by partisan and fringe outlets [1]. Major news organizations covering the broader tranche emphasize Epstein’s repeated attempts to name or disclaim associations with public figures — including statements that Bill Clinton “never” visited Epstein’s island — but contemporary mainstream reporting does not treat Epstein’s throwaway lines as verified facts about Hillary Clinton [2] [3] [4].

1. What the email actually says and where it came from

The specific phrase widely cited in online posts — Epstein’s alleged line “nussbaum white house counsel. . hillary doing naughties with vince.” — appears in reporting about an email exchange in which Michael Wolff sought Epstein’s comment about “Nussbaum/foster” and Epstein responded cryptically on May 25, 2016 [1]. That rendering comes from smaller conservative sites and aggregators; major outlets that have summarized the released files note Epstein made short, provocative, and often uncontextualized comments in his messages, but do not independently corroborate the substance of Epstein’s claim about Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster [2] [4].

2. How mainstream outlets framed these lines

Newsweek, Forbes, PBS, The Hill and other mainstream outlets covering the trove focus on the broader pattern of Epstein naming or denying connections to many powerful figures — for example, Epstein saying Bill Clinton “never” visited his private island in several emails — rather than treating single-line allegations as established fact [3] [2] [4] [5]. PBS and Newsweek note Epstein’s messages often served to boast, deflect, or sow confusion among journalists and contacts; they present the emails as sources of leads and questions, not proof [5] [2].

3. The provenance and limits of the evidence

House committees released tens of thousands of documents and emails from Epstein’s estate; reporters emphasize that many messages are informal, incomplete and written by Epstein about third parties — a notoriously unreliable form of evidence without independent corroboration [4] [6]. Available reporting does not present corroborating documents or witness testimony that would substantiate the specific claim about Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster; the sources that repeat the line either quote the email as-is or amplify it in the context of conspiracy-minded coverage [1]. Forensic context such as metadata, contemporaneous attachments, or supporting witness statements are not cited in the articles provided [2] [4].

4. Competing interpretations and political uses

Conservative and fringe outlets have promoted the short Epstein line as fodder for long-standing “Clinton body count” and similar conspiracies; Wikipedia’s recent coverage documents how such theories recycle tenuous or debunked hints into broader accusations [7]. By contrast, outlets like PBS, Forbes and The Hill treat Epstein’s emails as part of a patchwork of documents that raise questions about social ties and influence, urging investigation rather than accepting stray claims at face value [5] [4] [3].

5. Why journalists and investigators treat the claim cautiously

Reporters stress that Epstein had motive to manipulate narratives about who did or did not visit his properties; he simultaneously sought to deny some associations (e.g., Clinton “never” on the island) while inserting provocative accusations elsewhere [4] [2]. Mainstream coverage therefore distinguishes raw email content from verified fact and highlights the need for corroboration from flight logs, witnesses, or other records — none of which the cited articles tie directly to the Hillary-Vince Foster allegation in these files [4] [5].

6. Takeaway for readers and researchers

The available document excerpts show Epstein wrote provocative, often unverified lines about many public figures; one such line referencing Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster appears in at least one released email and has been circulated by partisan sites [1]. Major reporting on the newly released troves treats those lines as leads to be checked, not as standalone proof, and stresses other documented claims (like Epstein’s denials about Bill Clinton visiting the island) where multiple emails repeat the point [4] [3]. If you want to assess the claim further, seek primary-document images, committee release notes, flight logs, or corroborating witness statements referenced in full reporting; those elements are not provided in the pieces cited here [2] [6].

Limitations: available sources do not include full email images or committee evidence packages tied explicitly to the Hillary–Vince Foster phrasing beyond the secondary reports cited above [1] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What did Hillary Clinton's email mentioning Jeffrey Epstein actually say and who received it?
Are there multiple emails linking Hillary Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein and where can they be found?
What context surrounds Hillary Clinton's email that references Jeffrey Epstein—was it campaign, State Department, or personal?
Have verified documents or FOIA releases confirmed the authenticity of Clinton's Epstein-related email?
How have fact-checkers and major news outlets reported on Hillary Clinton’s email referencing Jeffrey Epstein?