Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What has trump been convicted of
Executive summary
Donald Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts of first‑degree falsifying business records in the New York “hush‑money” case; a Manhattan jury returned that verdict on May 30, 2024 (34 counts) and related sentencing events followed in January 2025 [1] [2] [3]. Available sources do not mention other criminal convictions beyond this New York felony conviction; other prosecutions and civil judgments remain active or have separate outcomes in the record [4] [5].
1. The conviction that dominates reporting: 34 counts for falsifying business records
The central and repeatedly cited legal finding across reporting is that a Manhattan jury found Trump guilty on 34 counts of falsifying New York business records in the first degree tied to efforts to conceal hush‑money payments during the 2016 campaign; major outlets and court materials report the guilty verdict and characterize it as a historic first for a former U.S. president [2] [1] [6].
2. What the charge specifically was and why it mattered
Those 34 counts were convictions for falsifying business records — a New York statute — that prosecutors tied to payments intended to influence the 2016 election by concealing potentially damaging information; the verdict was framed by the Manhattan District Attorney as proof of a scheme to hide information from voters [7] [2]. Multiple news organizations and official court statements detail evidence presented at trial, including invoices, checks and witness testimony [7].
3. Sentencing and subsequent court actions noted in sources
Reporting shows sentencing activity occurred in January 2025 after the conviction (the New York courts’ docket and press material record sentencing proceedings), and later judicial rulings addressed the effect of other federal decisions on the New York conviction; for example, a judge ruled at one point that the Supreme Court’s presidential‑immunity decisions did not nullify the conviction in that case [1] [3]. Sources also show appeals and legal maneuvers have followed the verdict [1].
4. How outlets and officials framed its historical significance
News organizations presented the conviction as unprecedented: several outlets described Trump as the first former U.S. president convicted of felony crimes, a characterization grounded in the May 30, 2024, jury outcome [2] [5]. Commentators and criminal‑justice analysts have also noted the uniqueness of the prosecution and its political and legal ramifications [8].
5. Other criminal cases and how they differ from the New York conviction
Sources list multiple other indictments brought against Trump (federal and state) between 2023 and 2025 — in New York (which produced the conviction), Georgia, federal courts in Florida and D.C. — but those separate prosecutions were at different procedural stages: some were stayed, dismissed, appealed, or awaiting rulings on immunity or appointment questions; they are not described in the provided reporting as resulting in additional convictions [4] [5]. Available sources do not mention other criminal convictions beyond the New York falsifying‑records verdict [4] [1].
6. Civil judgments and non‑criminal rulings that appear in the record
Beyond criminal law, sources document significant civil judgments against Trump — for instance, an appeals court upholding an $83.3 million defamation judgment in the E. Jean Carroll case (reporting later in 2025) — but civil liabilities are legally distinct from criminal convictions and do not translate to felony convictions [9]. Reporting distinguishes the New York criminal conviction from these separate civil rulings [2] [9].
7. Political context, conflicting claims, and legal strategy
Trump and his lawyers have consistently denied wrongdoing and have argued the prosecutions are politically motivated; they have pursued appeals and invoked issues including presidential immunity and the constitutionality of special counsel appointments. News coverage records those defenses alongside prosecution claims and notes ongoing legal challenges [5] [4]. Readers should note that legal outcomes have shifted over time as appellate rulings and procedural decisions unfolded [1].
8. Limitations in the available reporting and what’s not covered
The sources provided document the New York conviction and reference multiple other cases but do not supply exhaustive outcomes for every indictment or later appellate dispositions beyond certain rulings and commutation/pardon activity in 2025; if you want the latest status of each separate prosecution or appeals docket entries, available sources do not mention those granular updates here and further targeted court records or recent news items would be needed [4] [3].
If you’d like, I can pull together a concise timeline of the New York case (charges, trial dates, verdict, sentencing and appeals) or list each other indictment with its reported procedural status based on the sources above.