Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What is Project 2025 and its main goals?
Executive summary
Project 2025 is a multi-part policy and personnel blueprint produced by the Heritage Foundation with contributions from more than 100 conservative groups and many former Trump aides; its core document, the 900‑page “Mandate for Leadership,” lays out hundreds of executive‑branch changes and a personnel plan to quickly staff a new conservative administration [1] [2] [3]. Key goals reported across outlets include concentrating executive power (unitary executive ideas), replacing career civil servants with ideological appointees, dismantling or reshaping agencies and programs (including civil‑rights enforcement, DEI programs, and parts of the social safety net), and a cultural agenda to roll back “woke” influences in government and education [4] [5] [6] [3].
1. What Project 2025 is and who made it — a roadmap for a conservative transition
Project 2025 is presented as a presidential transition and governance playbook spearheaded by the conservative Heritage Foundation, with input from more than 100 allied organizations and over 100 former Trump administration officials; it includes a public “Mandate for Leadership” that functions as both a policy guide and a personnel pipeline for a future conservative president [1] [2] [3]. FactCheck.org and Democracy Docket describe it as a detailed collection of policy proposals and transition recommendations intended for the “next conservative President,” and reporting shows many former administration figures helped write it [5] [7].
2. Concentrating presidential control — unitary executive and bureaucratic overhaul
A recurring, prominent theme is centralizing authority in the presidency: Project 2025 proposes expanding the president’s control over the federal bureaucracy and even reducing the independence of agencies — an approach critics describe as a version of the “unitary executive theory” that would place independent agencies and career functions under stronger presidential direction [4] [8]. Several outlets say the plan envisions structural changes such as combining or dismantling agencies (for example, proposals around immigration enforcement and Department of Homeland Security elements) to create more direct executive control [4] [8].
3. Personnel strategy — replacing career civil servants with aligned appointees
A core implementation mechanism is personnel: Project 2025 advocates inserting many more ideological political appointees into the executive branch and using executive orders or classification changes to move tens of thousands of civil‑service positions under political control, enabling rapid policy shifts by staffing agencies with ideologically aligned officials [1] [6]. The Heritage‑backed effort also produced recruitment tools and training programs to identify and prepare personnel for hundreds of positions [1] [3].
4. Specific policy ambitions — civil rights, DEI, regulatory rollbacks, and social policy
The document advances concrete policy aims across many domains: it calls for rolling back diversity, equity and inclusion programs, restricting or “deleting” terms such as “diversity” and “reproductive health” from federal usage, curtailing administrative civil‑rights enforcement (favoring court‑based enforcement), and reshaping social‑welfare, labor and education rules — including proposals to end or shrink programs such as Head Start and to alter overtime and student‑loan rules, according to watchdogs and summaries [5] [6] [9] [2]. Journalistic and advocacy reporting highlights proposed steps to limit abortion access via administrative routes and to remove LGBTQ protections from certain federal enforcement [1] [5].
5. Cultural project — “undoing wokeness” as central objective
Several outlets characterize Project 2025 as explicitly cultural: the Mandate for Leadership frames government action as a fight against “wokeness” and proposes large‑scale cultural and ideological reversals inside government, education and public institutions, which critics say amounts to a deliberate reshaping of public culture [3] [8]. Heritage published responses defending the project and framing criticism as ideological opposition [10].
6. Criticism, alarm, and mixed reception — from “authoritarian” warnings to conservative defense
Critics — including civil‑rights groups, progressive think tanks and journalists — argue Project 2025 threatens civil‑service neutrality, civil‑rights enforcement, and separation of powers, with some scholars calling it an authoritarian blueprint [6] [10] [11]. Supporters and Heritage defenders argue it’s a practical transition plan to implement conservative priorities and assert opponents distort its aims; Heritage publicly released rebuttals framing critics as “leftists” who hate the project [10] [1].
7. Implementation and real‑world follow‑through — partial uptake and tracking
Reporting since 2024 documents that many people tied to Project 2025 entered administrations and that several early executive actions tracked to the plan were implemented quickly; independent trackers and outlets report a mix of completed objectives and slower or stalled items, with watchdogs monitoring hundreds of proposed executive actions across agencies [8] [12] [11]. Newsweek and other trackers indicate a significant portion of the agenda has been pursued but implementation rates vary over time and by proposal [12] [11].
8. What reporting does not settle
Available sources do not mention an exhaustive, single-source tally of every Project 2025 item that has and has not been implemented; similarly, while many sources link specific proposals to the plan, available reporting does not uniformly establish which measures require congressional action versus those the executive could enact unilaterally (not found in current reporting; see [5], p1_s9).