Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What percentage of the DHS budget is allocated to ICE?
Executive summary
Available reporting gives multiple figures for ICE funding but no single definitive percentage of the DHS budget that ICE represents; the FY2026 ICE request/justification lists $11.3 billion for ICE [1], while House Republican FY25 appropriations materials cite $11 billion for ICE and a total DHS discretionary allocation of $64.81 billion [2] [3]. Using those documents, ICE would be roughly 17% of the cited $64.81 billion allocation (11 / 64.81 ≈ 17%) but other large additions and reconciliation actions reported elsewhere would change that share substantially [4] [5].
1. What the official budget papers show: ICE dollars in isolation
The Department of Homeland Security’s FY2026 Congressional Budget Justification states the FY2026 Budget includes $11.3 billion for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) [1]. Separately, House Appropriations materials for a FY25 homeland security bill list $11 billion for ICE [2] and the House Committee describes the homeland security bill as providing a total discretionary allocation of $64.81 billion for DHS [3]. Those are the clearest, component-level numbers in the documents provided [1] [2] [3].
2. A simple arithmetic share — one defensible estimate
If you divide the ICE figure cited by the House Committee ($11 billion) by the Committee’s total DHS discretionary allocation ($64.81 billion), you get roughly 17% (11 / 64.81 ≈ 0.17) [2] [3]. Using DHS’s FY26 request number ($11.3 billion) against the same $64.81 billion total produces a very similar share. These calculations are straightforward but depend entirely on which totals and years you choose [1] [3].
3. Why that percentage can be misleading — reconciliation and one‑time infusions
Recent legislation and reconciliation packages reported in these sources can greatly change ICE’s effective resources. Analyses and advocacy groups say multi‑year reconciliation funding could add tens of billions to ICE over several years — figures like roughly $30 billion over four years or $75 billion across 2025–2029 are cited in different pieces of reporting and commentary [5] [6]. Federal News Network reports a bill that would allocate $8 billion to hire new ICE officers and additional sums for bonuses and recruiting, which would materially expand ICE resources beyond the baseline appropriation [4]. Those one‑time or multi‑year injections aren’t always counted the same way in “DHS budget” totals, so headline percentage shares can jump or fall depending on whether you include them [5] [6] [4].
4. Competing interpretations and political framing
Advocacy and watchdog groups emphasize how reconciliation and supplemental provisions can effectively triple or dramatically increase ICE’s spending relative to prior-year baselines, framing the result as an unprecedented expansion of deportation capacity [5] [6] [7]. House appropriators and some media pieces have framed ICE spending as “overspending” or reliant on reprogramming from other DHS components, pointing to historical transfers totaling $1.8 billion between 2014–2023 [8] [9]. Supporters of larger enforcement budgets argue that additional funds are necessary to meet operational needs like detention capacity, hiring, and transportation [3] [4]. Both lines of argument rest on the same budget mechanics but stress different policy priorities and accountability concerns [8] [3].
5. Limitations and gaps in the available reporting
The sources provided do not present a single, authoritative DHS‑wide percentage that includes every possible funding stream (base appropriations, emergency/designated funds, reconciliation allotments, unobligated balances, transfers, and multi‑year set‑asides) for a single fiscal year. Some sources treat multi‑year reconciliation sums as immediate increases to “this year’s” ICE resources for scorekeeping or rhetorical effect; others allocate them across years [6] [5]. The DHS budget portal lists many documents but the specific comparison you ask for — a canonical, apples‑to‑apples percentage of total DHS budget going to ICE including or excluding reconciliation and supplemental funds — is not spelled out in the documents supplied [10].
6. How to get a precise, defensible percentage
To produce a single, widely defensible percentage you would need to (a) pick a fiscal year (e.g., FY2025 or FY2026), (b) decide which components to include in “DHS budget” (only discretionary appropriations? plus emergency/reconciliation funds? plus transfers?), and then (c) compare that total to the ICE figure for the same accounting basis [3] [1] [6]. The documents provided give clear component figures (ICE = $11.0B or $11.3B; DHS discretionary = $64.81B) to compute one reasonable estimate (~17%) but also provide reporting that shows substantial additional funding streams that would change that share materially if included [2] [3] [1] [4] [5].
Bottom line: using the House Committee’s DHS discretionary allocation ($64.81B) and the ICE appropriation ($11B–$11.3B) yields roughly 17% [3] [2] [1]. Available sources do not present a single standardized percentage that incorporates reconciliation and other extraordinary funding in a uniform way [6] [5].