What training does ICE agents have

Checked on January 25, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) law-enforcement personnel undergo a mix of federally run academy courses, agency-specific follow-on training, firearms/driver/physical conditioning and language instruction—most of it delivered at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) in Georgia—though the exact curriculum and length vary by job stream (ERO, HSI, deportation officer, special agent) and have changed over time [1] [2] [3].

1. The core: FLETC and basic academy programs that form the backbone

Most ICE law-enforcement hires attend FLETC courses as the foundation: HSI special-agents typically do the 12-week Criminal Investigator Training Program (CITP) followed by an HSI-specific follow-on (HSISAT) that training documents describe as roughly 13–15 weeks with instruction in criminal and immigration law, surveillance, undercover operations, firearms and fitness [2] [4] [5]; Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) officers attend basic immigration law enforcement programs at FLETC—described in public materials as programs spanning roughly 16 to 22 weeks depending on the source and the legacy course combined with required follow-ons [6] [1] [7].

2. Specialty modules: firearms, driving, language and scenario-based work

Beyond classroom law and investigation modules, training explicitly includes firearms qualification, defensive tactics, emergency vehicle operations (driver training), scenario-based exercises and regular physical fitness assessments; recruits must pass multiple written exams and firearms/physical standards or face remedial training or removal from the program [8] [5] [1] [4]. ICE also operates a multi-week Spanish Language Training Program for many ERO recruits—commonly referenced as approximately five weeks—because language skills are mission-critical [8] [9] [6].

3. Testing, remediation and administrative safeguards (and their limits)

ICE’s published training rules require minimum passing scores on FLETC written examinations (a 70% standard is explicitly cited) and provide remedial instruction and re-testing pathways; failure to meet standards multiple times can remove a trainee from the program [8]. Job listings and ICE FAQs add that recruits face pre-employment screening—medical exams, physical fitness tests, drug testing and sometimes polygraph—and that training completion is a condition for many positions [10] [7].

4. Variation, recent operational shortcuts and political scrutiny

Public reporting and fact-checks show that training length and delivery have not been static: some sources and news reporting during hiring surges describe shortened or altered schedules (for example, claims of 47–48 day packages or compressed weekly schedules), and outlets have documented errors where recruits were routed into field offices after minimal online training; fact-checkers and ICE statements, however, show disagreement over exact durations and whether shortened curricula met formal requirements, demonstrating both real program variability and political contestation around training adequacy [11] [12] [3].

5. What’s consistent — and what remains unclear from available reporting

Consistently across ICE and independent career guides, training blends federal academy instruction (CITP, UPTP, HSISAT or BIETP/ERO programs), practical skill training (firearms, driving, scenarios), language and legal coursework, and rigorous testing and fitness standards [2] [4] [5] [1]. What the publicly available reporting does not settle is a single, unchanging total “weeks” number that applies to every ICE hire—durations differ by career path (ERO officer vs. HSI special agent vs. deportation officer), by legacy vs. current curricula, and have been modified during hiring surges—so claiming one uniform length for “ICE agent training” risks misleading without specifying the job stream or the year [6] [1] [11].

Want to dive deeper?
How do training curricula differ between ICE ERO deportation officers and HSI special agents?
What internal ICE oversight or after-action reviews exist when recruits are reported to have incomplete training?
How have recent hiring surges affected on-the-job mentorship and remedial training capacity at ICE?