Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What was the motive behind the Steve Scalise shooting?
Executive summary
The available reporting attributes the June 14, 2017, shooting that wounded Rep. Steve Scalise to shooter James T. Hodgkinson, who targeted Republican lawmakers at a congressional baseball practice; several sources report evidence he asked whether players were Republicans, carried a GOP list, and was a left-wing activist, while other early accounts said no motive had been formally announced by authorities [1] [2] [3] [4]. Congressional investigators and Scalise himself have argued the attack was intended as an assault on Republican members of Congress, while at least one official strand of the FBI record was described as classifying the incident as “suicide by cop,” a designation later criticized and reviewed [5] [2] [6].
1. A politically targeted attack, according to many participants and later reports
Witnesses at the scene and colleagues who survived the shooting reported that the gunman appeared to be targeting elected officials — specifically House Republicans — and that he asked people approaching the field whether those remaining were Democrats or Republicans before opening fire; reports also note he reportedly carried a list of Republican lawmakers [2] [3] [4]. Scalise himself has said the shooter “set out that day to kill a lot of Republicans” and described the attack as intended to be “a massacre of House Republicans” in interviews and a docuseries [6] [7].
2. Shooter background and political identity
Profiles of James T. Hodgkinson, the shooter, describe him as a 66‑year‑old from Belleville, Illinois, with a history of left‑wing activism and previous brushes with the law; Time reported investigators were probing his social media, motives and possible associates while noting he had expressed support for Occupy Wall Street in the past [3]. Wikipedia summarizes that Hodgkinson was a left‑wing activist and notes the Virginia attorney general characterized the attack as “an act of terrorism ... fueled by rage against Republican legislators” [1].
3. Official characterizations and internal disagreements
Despite on‑the‑ground testimony suggesting a political motive, parts of the investigative record drew controversy. Members of Congress and some staff said the FBI initially leaned toward classifying the incident as “suicide by cop,” a conclusion that angered Republicans who felt the political motive was being downplayed; House intelligence documents assembled by Republicans later argued the shooter was motivated by “a desire to commit an attack on Members of Congress” and criticized the “suicide by cop” framing [2] [5]. Scalise and other Republicans publicly pushed for renewed scrutiny of the FBI’s conclusions [2] [7].
4. Early media coverage and caution about motive
Contemporaneous news accounts emphasized that authorities had not announced an official motive in the immediate aftermath; for example, BBC’s reporting on the day of the attack repeatedly stated “No motive has been given for the attack” while also reporting witnesses’ observations that the attacker was “going after elected officials” [4]. Time likewise reported the FBI was investigating and had not yet confirmed a motive in June 2017 [3].
5. How survivors and lawmakers framed the attack politically
Survivors and Republican leaders framed the shooting as political violence aimed at their party. Scalise and other Republicans have consistently described the shooter as trying to kill GOP members specifically and have used the incident to call for more serious attention to politically motivated violence, with Scalise saying the attack “was intended to be a massacre of House Republicans” [6] [7]. This framing has shaped political debate about motivations for violence and the adequacy of the investigation [2] [5].
6. Evidence cited for motive and limitations in public records
Arguments that Hodgkinson was politically motivated point to: witness statements that he asked whether people on the field were Democrats or Republicans, a purported list of GOP names found on him, his prior political activism and social‑media postings, and investigators’ notes suggesting an intent to attack members of Congress [2] [3] [5]. However, early official statements withheld an explicit motive and some investigative classifications — notably the “suicide by cop” label — created dispute over whether the violence was primarily political or driven by other factors; the public record assembled here contains both the political‑motive evidence and the fact that parts of the investigative community initially characterized the event differently [4] [2] [5].
7. Bottom line and unresolved questions
The dominant narrative in survivor testimony, Republican statements, and later House investigative material is that Hodgkinson sought to target Republican lawmakers and was politically motivated [6] [2] [5]. At the same time, contemporaneous press reports and some investigative documents show authorities did not immediately announce a definitive motive and that official characterizations of the shooter’s intent were contested — meaning readers should weigh both the eyewitness/political framing and the procedural disputes in the investigative record [4] [3] [5].
Limitations: available sources do not include final public FBI conclusions here and do not provide complete forensic detail; claims about other possible co‑conspirators or detailed psychological motive beyond political anger are not covered in the provided reporting (not found in current reporting).