Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Where can I find the full, official text of the 2025 articles of impeachment and supporting evidence?
Executive summary
The full, official texts of multiple 2025 articles of impeachment filed against President Donald J. Trump are publicly available on Congress.gov and House documents: Representative Al Green’s H.Res.537 and H.Res.415 appear in the congressional record (see the bill pages and the PDF of the submitted text) and Rep. Shri Thanedar’s seven-article filing is posted on Congress.gov and his office release (H.Res.353/H.Res.?? per listings) [1] [2] [3] [4]. For video and floor context, C-SPAN archived the floor presentation of articles [5]. Below I map where to find the authoritative texts, where evidence/supporting materials are reported or absent, and the political context that shapes access and interpretation.
1. Where to find the official text: use Congress.gov and docs.house.gov
The Library of Congress’ Congress.gov site hosts official bill pages and the full text of House resolutions that contain articles of impeachment—examples include H.Res.537 and H.Res.415, each with a “Text” view that reproduces the article language the House received [1] [2]. In addition, the House publishes submitted resolutions and “Bills This Week” PDF packets (the Al Green submission PDF is on docs.house.gov) that contain the formal complaint language as introduced [3]. Those pages are the primary public sources for the wording members introduced in 2025 [1] [3] [2].
2. Which specific resolutions and filings are in the record
Reporting and House postings identify multiple 2025 filings: Rep. Shri Thanedar introduced a seven-article resolution that was publicized by his office and covered by Axios and Common Dreams (describing the seven articles: obstruction, usurpation, bribery/corruption, etc.) [4] [6] [7]. Rep. Al Green filed H.Res.537 and H.Res.415 at different times; Congress.gov lists H.Res.537 (text and status) and H.Res.415’s text is also on Congress.gov [1] [2]. The House document PDF for Al Green’s June 24 submission is on docs.house.gov [3].
3. Supporting evidence: what’s in those documents and what’s not
The texts on Congress.gov and the House PDFs generally include narrative allegations and specific factual claims intended to justify each article—the resolution text itself is the place to find the alleged facts the sponsors cite [1] [2] [3]. However, “supporting evidence” beyond the resolution language (such as committee reports, sworn depositions, or document exhibits) is not necessarily attached to every privileged or member-filed resolution. Available sources do not mention a single consolidated evidentiary appendix attached to these 2025 member-filed resolutions; reporting and the bill text show allegations but do not list a separately published body of primary documentary exhibits on Congress.gov for each filing [1] [2] [3].
4. Floor action and congressional votes that affect access
When a member files a privileged resolution, the text becomes part of the House record; floor debate and any motion votes (for example, the motion to table) are recorded separately. GovTrack shows that on June 24, 2025, a motion related to Al Green’s H.Res.537 was voted on and recorded as House Vote #175—these procedural records are searchable and show whether a resolution was tabled, advanced, or otherwise acted upon [8]. C-SPAN also archived Green’s floor remarks when he brought articles to the floor, which gives context for the record beyond the written text [5].
5. Media and member press releases for quicker access and explanation
Members’ personal or campaign websites and press releases can host the introduced articles and explanatory letters. For instance, Thanedar’s office posted a press release summarizing his seven articles and linking to the filing; Al Green’s office posted a release and materials describing H.Res.415 [4] [9]. These are useful for a quick read and for the sponsor’s stated rationale but are not a substitute for the official congressional text on Congress.gov or the House PDF [3] [2].
6. Political context that shapes availability and interpretation
Multiple outlets note that these filings are unlikely to succeed while the Republican Party controls the House (Newsweek, Axios reporting on political prospects), and that some filings are symbolic or intended to force debate rather than secure conviction—this affects whether committees gather and publish supporting evidence beyond the resolution text [10] [7]. Critics and supporters contest whether the allegations meet “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” and prior impeachments’ partisan divisions show competing narratives over what constitutes sufficient evidence [11] [12].
7. How to obtain the most complete record and next steps
Start with the Congress.gov “Text” pages and the docs.house.gov PDF packets for the specific resolution numbers (H.Res.537, H.Res.415, Thanedar’s filing) to read the full, official language [1] [2] [3]. For evidence beyond the text: search House committee pages, committee reports, and the Congressional Record for hearings or exhibits tied to any formal inquiry—available sources do not mention a single consolidated exhibit archive attached to these 2025 member-filed resolutions [1] [2] [3]. Finally, use GovTrack for vote transcripts and C‑SPAN for floor video to see how members framed the alleged evidence during debate [8] [5].
Limitations: My analysis uses only the documents and reporting you provided; if you want direct links to each resolution page or the specific PDF file names, say which resolution (Thanedar’s, Green’s, or another) you want and I will extract the exact Congress.gov and docs.house.gov links cited above [1] [3] [2].