Which individual defendants (Giuliani, Lindell, others) faced separate defamation judgments or settlements related to 2020 election claims?

Checked on January 9, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

A cluster of high‑profile individuals and media organizations were swept into defamation litigation over false 2020 election claims; the most concrete monetary settlements in the record involve media companies (Fox, Newsmax) while individual actors such as Mike Lindell have faced court sanctions and adverse rulings in related suits, and figures including Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell were named as defendants though public reporting in the provided sources does not uniformly show final judgments or settlements against them [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. Fox’s multimillion‑dollar settlement — corporate headline, individual hosts implicated

Dominion Voting Systems extracted a $787.5 million settlement from Fox News and Fox Corporation, resolving claims that the network repeatedly aired false allegations that Dominion rigged the 2020 election; coverage of that corporate settlement also documented internal Fox communications showing on‑air personalities privately doubting the claims they aired, bringing individual hosts into the discovery spotlight even as the headline resolution was with the corporate defendants [1] [5] [6].

2. Newsmax paid damages and prior individual consequences followed from programming choices

Newsmax reached a $67 million settlement with Dominion over similar false election coverage, and earlier Newsmax paid other settlements tied to false election claims (including a reported $40 million to Smartmatic), underscoring how network decisions translated into legal exposure and financial judgments — these outcomes were reported as settlements rather than jury findings against individual hosts [2] [7].

3. Mike Lindell — sanctions, summary judgment rulings, and a distinct legal trajectory

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell was explicitly sanctioned by a court for filing what a judge called “frivolous” election litigation, and Smartmatic secured a significant summary judgment ruling in its favor against Lindell and MyPillow, with the court finding no evidentiary basis that Smartmatic’s products were designed to manipulate ballots or steal elections [3]. Those actions amount to judicial rebukes and favorable legal rulings for the voting‑technology plaintiffs against an individual defendant rather than a large publicized settlement like Fox’s [3].

4. Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell — named defendants, still subject to ongoing or consolidated litigation in reporting

Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell were named among individual defendants in defamation suits brought by voting‑technology companies (Smartmatic and Dominion), and reporting documents their inclusion alongside media figures, but the sources provided here show they were targets of lawsuits and consolidated proceedings rather than uniformly documenting final monetary judgments or publicly disclosed settlements against them in the cited material [4] [8] [9].

5. Media personalities named but outcomes vary: Lou Dobbs, Maria Bartiromo, Jeanine Pirro and others

Smartmatic and Dominion named several on‑air personalities — for example Lou Dobbs, Maria Bartiromo and Jeanine Pirro were identified in Smartmatic’s complaint — and the Smartmatic litigation forced discovery into their practices; the sources show these individuals were co‑defendants in suits but do not uniformly record final personal judgments or settlements against each host in the material provided here [4] [8].

6. Broader pattern: corporate settlements versus varied individual results

Taken together, the pattern in the reporting is that the largest, documented monetary resolutions were corporate (Fox’s $787.5 million; Newsmax’s settlement with Dominion), while individual defendants have faced a spectrum of legal outcomes — from sanctions and summary‑judgment losses (Lindell) to being named in high‑stakes suits (Giuliani, Powell, various on‑air hosts) without consistent, publicly documented individual settlements in the sources provided [1] [2] [3] [4].

7. Limits of the public record in these sources and next steps for verification

The cited reporting chronicles many defendants named across Dominion and Smartmatic litigation and highlights major corporate settlements and specific adverse rulings against individuals like Lindell, but the sources do not provide a complete catalogue of every individual defendant’s final judgments or settlements — follow‑up in court dockets or more recent news coverage would be required to verify outcomes for particular named individuals such as Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and specific Fox hosts [1] [4] [3] [8].

Want to dive deeper?
What specific legal rulings were entered against Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell in Dominion or Smartmatic lawsuits, per court dockets?
How did internal Fox News communications revealed in discovery influence the Dominion settlement negotiations and claims of actual malice?
What sanctions and summary judgment details exist in the Smartmatic v. Lindell docket and what remedies were ordered against Lindell/MyPillow?