List of democratic leadership who has called trump a nazi

1. What the record actually shows: specific high-profile examples

Verifiable, mainstream reporting documents that Vice President Kamala Harris publicly called Donald Trump “a fascist” in October 2024 after comments by John Kelly, linking Trump’s statements to authoritarian or fascist tendencies ^[1]. Other sources cite Democratic strategists and leaders who have compared Trump to Hitler or Nazis in commentary or campaign rhetoric, but the available reporting emphasizes “fascist” and “Hitler” analogies rather than a clean list of officials who used the single word “Nazi” about Trump ^{[2] [3]}.

2. Party debate: some Democrats use hard comparisons, others warn against them

The Hill reported an internal Democratic debate: some strategists and operatives argue that comparisons to Hitler or Nazis can be meaningful if tied to specific behavior and consequences, while others warn that mere name‑calling falls short and risks backfiring ^[2]. That same piece notes Democrats have increasingly used Nazi/Hitler comparisons in attacking Trump and his allies, but stresses messaging nuance — say why the comparison matters, not just the label ^[2].

3. Media disputes over whether Democrats have made the comparisons

There are contested media claims. For example, Fox News cited an instance where MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said she didn’t believe any Democrat had compared Trump to Hitler — a claim that outlets and archives dispute by pointing to documented comparisons by figures such as Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and others ^[3]. This highlights how media outlets and commentators disagree about how widespread or explicit such comparisons have been ^[3].

4. Opinion pieces and partisan commentary amplify the claim that Democrats call Trump a Nazi

Opinion columns and partisan sites strongly assert Democrats routinely call Trump or Republicans “Nazis,” using that contention to argue these comparisons are overused or irresponsible ^{[4] [5]}. These pieces are interpretive and polemical rather than straightforward news lists; they often frame the comparisons as part of a broader charge about rhetorical escalation in politics ^{[4] [5]}.

5. Context: why Democrats who make analogies cite specific behaviors

Reporting explains that when some Democrats invoke Nazism or Hitler it is usually intended to signal perceived threats to democratic norms — for example, claims about creating preferred realities, encouraging repression of dissent, or using dehumanizing rhetoric about opponents and migrants — rather than asserting literal equivalence with the Holocaust ^{[2] [6]}. The Hill and PBS pieces focus on messaging implications and the need to connect analogy to concrete actions ^{[2] [6]}.

6. Limits of current reporting and what’s not found

Available sources do not supply a single authoritative roster listing every Democratic officeholder who explicitly used the word “Nazi” about Trump; much of the coverage documents examples, debates, and opinion commentary instead ^{[2] [3]}. If you want a comprehensive, sourced list of individual statements, current reporting in these items is incomplete: it documents some instances and disputes but does not assemble an exhaustive catalog ^{[2] [3]}.

7. How to interpret competing claims and partisan framing

When conservative outlets and commentators say “Democrats call Trump a Nazi,” they sometimes treat a range of analogies (Hitler, fascist, Nazi, authoritarian) as interchangeable and amplified for political effect ^{[4] [5]}. Conversely, some Democrats and allied commentators argue the analogies are warnings about democratic erosion and insist that comparisons are based on observed actions, not mere insult ^{[2] [1]}. Both frames are present in the record and shape how audiences perceive the frequency and seriousness of such labels ^{[2] [4]}.

8. Practical next steps if you want a documented list

To build a verifiable list, review primary source material (transcripts, tweets, speeches) and news reports for each alleged instance. The articles cited here provide starting points—examples and critiques—but do not substitute for a line‑by‑line audit of public statements by individual Democrats ^{[2] [3] [1]}.