Which Democratic leaders compared Trump to Hitler during the 2016 and 2020 campaigns?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Multiple journalists, historians and commentators compared Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler or invoked Nazi analogies during 2016 and again around 2020; examples include book reviewers, academics and prominent columnists who warned of fascist parallels [1] [2]. Some Democratic figures and leading liberal voices made such comparisons or strong warnings—while other Democrats and many historians warned that overuse risks backfiring [1] [3].
1. Who used Hitler or Nazi analogies in 2016: journalists, historians and public intellectuals
In 2016 the comparison often came from critics in media and academia rather than uniformly from elected Democratic leaders: New York Times reviewer Michiko Kakutani used a description of Hitler in a way that evoked Trump in September 2016 [1]. Columnists such as Paul Krugman and other opinion writers framed the risks of Trump’s rhetoric in terms that invoked historical parallels to fascism and Hitler [4] [1]. Scholarship and commentary published that year — including books and historians’ analyses — debated whether Trump’s rise justified analogies to Weimar-era Germany [1] [2].
2. The 2016 debate inside and outside the Democratic coalition
Democratic-aligned commentators and some public intellectuals urged alarm, but mainstream Democratic leaders were not a single, unanimous source of explicit Hitler comparisons in the record assembled here. Academic and journalistic voices argued that equating Trump with Hitler could be persuasive to some voters but would also risk “crying wolf,” a critique voiced by both analysts and some Democrats after 2016 [1]. The reporting collected stresses that media and historians were central in making and contesting such analogies [1] [2].
3. What re-emerged around 2020: historians, newsletter writers and analysts
By 2020 the debate revived with historians and high-profile writers again warning of authoritarian parallels; Yale historian Timothy Snyder published On Tyranny and other respected voices made empirical comparisons that some characterized as serious warnings rather than mere hyperbole [2]. Some progressive columnists and historians continued to argue that Trump’s actions and rhetoric warranted comparison to authoritarian templates, and that these comparisons should be rooted in scholarship [5] [2].
4. Notable individual examples from the sourced record
The sources name a mix of media figures, historians and commentators rather than listing specific Democratic officeholders who directly said “Trump is Hitler.” The Cambridge history review and related essays document media figures and scholars—Michiko Kakutani and Timothy Snyder among them—drawing parallels and prompting debate [1] [2]. The Reuters piece documents private comparisons by individuals later allied with Trump (JD Vance) but that is not a Democratic leader example and illustrates how such language circulated beyond party lines [6].
5. Critics and limits: why many warned against the comparison
Scholars and some Democrats warned that overstating the analogy could alienate voters and undermine credibility—Frank Bruni and other commentators argued the “intemperate condemnation” after 2016 hurt Democrats, and multiple historians cautioned about the historical differences between Trump and Hitler [1] [2]. The Hill’s reporting notes Democrats were split on the tactic, with some seeing political benefit and others warning it “boomerangs” [3].
6. How to read the record and what’s missing here
Available sources emphasize journalists, historians and commentators as the primary actors invoking Nazi analogies in 2016 and 2020; explicit lists of named Democratic elected leaders who publicly compared Trump to Hitler are not provided in these items (not found in current reporting). The coverage shows contested interpretations: some experts treated the comparison as a substantive historical argument; others said it was hyperbolic and counterproductive [1] [2].
7. Takeaway: a contested rhetorical strategy, not a single-party consensus
The sourced record shows that comparisons of Trump to Hitler appeared across media, academia and political commentary in 2016 and 2020; they were used by prominent liberal intellectuals and journalists and rekindled by historians by 2020, but the tactic remained contested within Democratic circles and among historians because of political risk and important historical differences [1] [3] [2].