Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Which Democratic members of the House voted for the short-term CRs and which voted against them?

Checked on November 3, 2025

Executive Summary

House Democrats overwhelmingly opposed the short-term continuing resolutions (CRs) put forward by Republicans, with multiple reports indicating nearly all House Democrats voted against Republican stopgap measures, while a small number of Senate Democrats broke ranks to support similar bills. Reporting and roll-call summaries in the provided analyses emphasize unanimous or near-unanimous House Democratic opposition (with one noted exception in at least one account), and contrasting Senate behavior where several Democrats voted yea on Republican-backed measures [1] [2] [3].

1. What people claimed — “Who voted for or against?” and why that claim matters

The central claim underlying the query is a simple factual question: which Democratic House members supported the short-term CRs and which opposed them. The supplied analyses consistently report that every House Democrat except one voted against the Republican stopgap, framing the House delegation as largely unified against the Republican bills [1] [2]. This matters because a near-unified House Democratic opposition signals party discipline on funding conditions tied to policy priorities and sets up a contrast with the Senate, where some Democrats voted to advance Republican measures. The difference in behavior between chambers became a focal point in coverage of the shutdown and influenced messaging about responsibility for reopening the government [4] [5].

2. What the contemporaneous roll-call summaries show and where they conflict

Roll-call summaries and bill records provided in the analyses do not offer a single definitive list of individual House Democrat votes. Some of the summaries explicitly note absence of detailed House vote lists in those articles [4] [6] [5]. One roll-call document cited suggests most House Democrats voted Yea on a specific bill (H.R. 5860), while other reporting states the opposite narrative — that most House Democrats voted against Republican stopgap measures (p3_s2 versus p2_s1). These conflicting signals underscore that different short-term CR proposals and separate votes are being conflated in reporting, and that without direct roll-call transcripts for each specific CR, summaries can be misleading [6] [7].

3. The Senate split — an important contrast that adds context

Multiple sources highlight that several Senate Democrats broke with their party to support Republican-backed CRs, listing names such as John Fetterman, Catherine Cortez Masto, Brian Schatz, and others who voted to advance a funding measure [2] [3]. This Senate behavior is documented with specific roll-call notations in the provided analyses, and it explains why some coverage emphasizes bipartisan votes in the Senate while simultaneously noting united House Democratic opposition. The difference between House and Senate votes reflects chamber dynamics: Senators sometimes vote to advance measures to a floor conference or as procedural maneuvers that differ from final House-level positions [2] [3].

4. Gaps in the available reporting — why you cannot yet get a clean list from these sources

The supplied analyses repeatedly state that articles do not include a complete list of which individual House Democrats voted Yea or Nay on these short-term CRs [4] [6] [5]. Where roll-call entries exist, they sometimes reference different bills or past sessions (e.g., H.R. 5860 or roll calls from prior Congresses), creating ambiguity about which CR is at issue [7]. Because the materials conflate Senate and House actions and sometimes reference different measures, a clean, authoritative roster of which specific House Democrats voted for or against the most recent short-term CRs is not present in the supplied source set [6] [7].

5. How to reconcile the narratives — divergent reporting and likely explanations

Reconciling the divergent accounts requires recognizing that reporters and roll-call trackers were referencing different votes, different bill numbers, and different chambers, which produces apparent contradictions: one account that “every House Democrat except one voted against” a Republican stopgap likely refers to a particular House vote, while a roll-call summary showing many House Democrats voting yea may track a separate procedural motion or an older session vote [1] [7]. The clear, consistent element across sources is that House Democrats were portrayed as largely opposed to Republican short-term CRs, while a small number of Senate Democrats supported advancing Republican measures [1] [2] [3].

6. Bottom line and next steps for verification

Based on the provided materials, the most defensible conclusion is that House Democrats largely voted against the Republican short-term CRs, with at least one reported exception, and that several Senate Democrats voted in favor of Republican-backed measures. However, the sources lack a definitive, itemized House roll-call for the specific CRs in question, so anyone seeking a named list should consult the official House roll-call records for the exact bill numbers and dates or comprehensive congressional roll-call databases to confirm each representative’s vote. The supplied analyses make clear that without direct roll-call transcripts tied to the specific CRs, definitive individual names cannot be validated from these sources alone [4] [6] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
Which Democratic House members voted for the continuing resolution on September 2023?
How did Representative Hakeem Jeffries vote on the short-term CR in 2023?
Which Democratic senators supported the House short-term CR and did any cross party lines?
What reasons did Democratic members give for voting against the short-term CR?
Is there a downloadable roll call or CSV of House votes on the short-term continuing resolution 2023