Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Which European country has the strictest social media laws?
Executive Summary
France, Germany and a handful of EU member states lead Europe in the most far‑reaching national social‑media interventions, but no single country can be definitively labeled “the strictest” because the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and related rules now set a high, common floor while member states pursue different, sometimes competing, higher standards [1] [2]. Recent moves on age verification, proposed bans for minors, and country‑level emergency powers mean the landscape is rapidly evolving: France, Denmark and Spain are prominent on minors’ restrictions, Germany and France on rapid content removal and election safeguards, and the European Commission is pushing cross‑border tools and guidance that may supersede or shape national schemes [3] [4] [5] [1].
1. Bold claims being circulated — who says what and when
News coverage and policy reports from 2024–2025 pushed strong claims: France is frequently described as pursuing the strictest national regime through proposed bans on under‑15s and parental consent frameworks, and Spain, Denmark and Greece have public plans or drafts aiming at aggressive age limits or parental controls [3] [4] [5]. Other analyses assert Germany’s NetzDG and France’s emergency election measures make those two states particularly assertive about takedowns and penalties for platforms [2]. The European Commission meanwhile has introduced EU‑level instruments—draft guidance and an age‑verification app—to harmonize protections for minors and reduce the need for divergent national rules [4] [1]. These competing narratives reflect both national legislative action and the EU’s drive to standardize obligations, which complicates simple “most strict” rankings [6].
2. The EU’s rulebook that changes the question—floor, not ceiling
The Digital Services Act, adopted in 2022, establishes a uniform and rigorous baseline for platforms, including transparency about moderation, limits on targeted advertising to minors, and mandatory risk assessments for very large online platforms; this EU framework reduces the extent to which one country can claim absolute uniqueness in strictness because all member states now enforce the same core duties [1]. The 2024 European Media Services Regulation clarifies that member states may adopt more protective rules, allowing national measures above the EU baseline where they enhance pluralism or protect rights, so national divergence remains legally possible [6]. The practical consequence is that assessing “strictest” must compare national measures layered on top of the DSA rather than national laws in isolation, because the DSA narrows the gap between countries by imposing high common standards [1] [6].
3. Minors and social media — France, Denmark and Spain at the forefront
Several recent pieces of reporting from mid‑2025 mark child protection as the most dynamic policy front: France has pressed for parental‑consent mandates and even a social‑media ban for under‑15s, backed rhetorically by Spain and Greece in EU discussions, though some measures await EU clearance or further legislation to take effect [4] [3]. Denmark has publicly considered a full ban for under‑15s and hosted the Jutland Declaration to rally member states around stronger age checks and verification tools; Spain’s draft similarly targets under‑16 access restrictions [5] [7]. At the EU level, the Commission’s proposals for an age‑verification app and platform guidance aim to standardize protections, which could blunt the impact of unilateral national bans by providing common technical and legal pathways [4] [7].
4. Content removal, elections and Germany’s enforcement model
Beyond age rules, content enforcement and emergency powers distinguish national regimes. Germany’s Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) imposes tight takedown timelines and fines for failure to remove illegal content, and France’s election emergency law grants rapid intervention powers to curb false or misleading content during campaigns—both regimes are repeatedly cited as among Europe’s most enforceable and punitive [2]. Austria’s criminalisation of false news during elections shows another strand of robust national action. These measures target disinformation and hate speech with concrete penalties and faster processes than the DSA’s baseline mechanisms alone, which is why several analysts place France and Germany at the top end of enforcement strictness even while recognizing the EU’s harmonizing influence [2] [6].
5. Bottom line — no single “strictest” country, but a moving mosaic of stricter rules
The most accurate conclusion is that there is no uncontested single European country that permanently holds the title of “strictest”; instead, a patchwork of national measures—France and Germany’s aggressive enforcement, Denmark and Spain’s proposals on minors, and the EU’s DSA and media rules—creates multiple axes of strictness depending on the issue [3] [1] [2] [5]. Recent developments in 2024–2025 amplify protection for minors and accelerate enforcement during elections, and EU tools like an age‑verification app and harmonized guidance will increasingly shape how national rules operate in practice. The relevant comparison therefore is thematic: France and Spain lead on age restrictions, Germany and France on takedowns and fines, and the EU now sets a strong baseline that narrows—but does not eliminate—national differences [4] [1] [6].