Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which federal judges did Donald Trump appoint and how many were confirmed during his presidency?
Executive summary
Donald Trump’s first term produced a large, well-documented reshaping of the federal bench: 234 Article III judges were confirmed from 2017–2021, including three Supreme Court justices and 54 appellate judges [1] [2]. Reporting from late 2025 shows Trump’s second-term confirmations were ongoing but far slower: sources list varying second-term tallies (for example, 13–27 confirmed by autumn 2025 in different counts), and an aggregated 253 Article III confirmations cited on Wikipedia as of Nov. 21, 2025 (which appears to combine both terms) [3] [4] [5].
1. Trump’s first-term footprint: how big, and why it mattered
During his first term, President Trump secured confirmation of 234 Article III judges — a total repeatedly cited by Ballotpedia and other outlets — reshaping the judiciary because that cohort included three Supreme Court justices (Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett) and 54 appellate judges, numbers that exceeded many predecessors and materially shifted appellate courts [1] [2] [6]. Analysts and advocacy groups tie this to coordinated Senate strategy and use of Federalist Society–vetted lists that produced a bench more often described as originalist/textualist [2] [7].
2. Counting second-term confirmations: inconsistent snapshots in 2025 reporting
Coverage from 2025 shows varying tallies for Trump’s second-term confirmed judges because reporting dates differ and confirmations were unfolding: Ballotpedia reported 5 confirmed by Aug. 1, 2025, rising to 8 by Oct. 1 and 17 by Nov. 1 for that second-term year-to-date window [8] [9] [10]. Other outlets and watchdogs cited larger totals — for instance Common Dreams and some compilations claimed figures like 27 second-term appointments — while Wikipedia’s Nov. 21, 2025, entry cited 253 Article III judges overall, which appears to aggregate confirmations across both administrations [5] [3] [4]. The discrepancies reflect timing, different cutoffs, and whether sources report only second-term figures or cumulative totals [10] [3].
3. What counts as an “appointment” or “confirmation”? Be precise
Sources differentiate nominations, appointments, and confirmed Article III judges. Ballotpedia tracks nominees and confirmed Article III judges separately (nominations vs. confirmations), and notes that Trump nominated hundreds across terms and secured 234 confirmations in his first term alone [1]. Some White House materials from his earlier presidency framed different aggregates (e.g., including Article I courts) that can produce confusion if mixed with Article III counts [11]. Accurate counts therefore require checking whether a source means Article III lifetime judges (Supreme Court, courts of appeals, district courts), Article I or IV appointments, or cumulative numbers spanning both terms [1] [11].
4. Why the pace slowed in the second term — and competing explanations
Ballotpedia’s periodic tallies show a much slower confirmation pace in Trump’s second term through mid‑2025 (five by Sept. 1; eight by Oct. 1; 17 by Nov. 1), which observers place against historical norms for a president’s second term and attribute it to fewer vacancies, Senate calendar dynamics, and the inherently slower post‑election confirmation environment [12] [9] [10]. Advocacy groups and critics frame slower pace differently: some argue strategic delay in earlier years left fewer openings to fill now, others emphasize partisan fights or the vetting/nomination process itself [2] [7]. Available sources do not uniformly agree on a single dominant cause.
5. Political and legal implications: what experts say and what reporting shows
Multiple outlets and watchdogs argue Trump’s earlier appointees changed legal outcomes on issues like reproductive and LGBTQ+ rights, and that newly confirmed judges continue to produce high-profile rulings — sometimes rebuking the administration, sometimes upholding it — highlighting that ideological composition matters but individual judges can rule unpredictably [2] [13] [14]. Politico and The Guardian emphasize that judges from multiple appointing presidents have checked or rebuked administration policies, undercutting any simple story that appointees uniformly favor the sitting president [14] [13].
6. How to get a definitive, up‑to‑date list
For a precise, current roll call you must consult live trackers that specify their cutoffs: Ballotpedia’s federal-judges page lists nominees and confirmed judges by date [1], the federal judiciary’s vacancy tracker shows current vacancies and pending nominees [15], and consolidated lists (such as the Wikipedia "List of federal judges appointed by Donald Trump") provide compiled rosters but must be checked for update timestamps [3]. Available sources do not provide a single authoritative list frozen at your requested moment without checking their timestamps [3] [1] [15].
Limitations: I relied only on the supplied sources; some numbers vary by date and whether counts are per term or cumulative, so exact second‑term totals depend on each source’s cutoff [3] [10] [1].