Which members of the U.S. House accepted donations from donors tied to Jeffrey Epstein's network and how much did they receive?

1. What the reporting actually documents about donations

Several outlets note isolated examples: BBC and other live coverage state that “documents show he [Epstein] made contributions to Plaskett’s campaign” and that Plaskett had said she would donate roughly $8,000 in Epstein money to charities after trying to distance herself from him ^[1]. POLITICO reports the White House drawing attention to $32,000 in donations Epstein made to the DNC decades ago — a figure the administration used politically after Congress moved to release Epstein investigative files ^[2]. Those are the specific dollar amounts named in the supplied results ^{[1] [2]}.

2. How individual examples have been used politically

Reporting shows those donation facts have been weaponized in the political back-and‑forth around the Epstein files bill. The White House highlighted the $32,000 DNC donations as part of an attack line against Democrats after the House passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act ^[2]. Likewise, Plaskett’s previously disclosed Epstein-linked contributions became a focal point in efforts to censure or embarrass her on the House floor, showing how single-candidate donation revelations are amplified in partisan fights ^{[4] [1]}.

3. What investigative and data resources reporters point to — and their limits

Journalists and outlets reference databases like OpenSecrets to trace donor connections; OpenSecrets hosts FEC-derived federal contribution records and is the standard tool for this work ^[3]. However, the results you provided do not contain a systematic House-wide accounting derived from OpenSecrets or similar resources; they provide selective examples and political context rather than an exhaustive ledger of “which members” and “how much” ^{[3] [1] [2]}.

4. Reported push for the release of files and why donations matter now

Congress voted overwhelmingly to force release of Justice Department files on Epstein, a bill that became politically salient because investigators and critics hope the records could reveal wider networks or previously undisclosed connections; that political urgency is why media and the White House underscored campaign donations linked to Epstein when debating credibility and hypocrisy ^{[5] [6] [7]}. The near-unanimous House vote (427–1) and rapid Senate clearance set the stage for renewed scrutiny of any previously reported ties ^{[5] [8]}.

5. What the current sources do not show — gaps to be aware of

Available sources do not provide a comprehensive list of all House members who accepted donations tied to Epstein’s network or aggregate totals for each member; the supplied reporting cites specific instances (e.g., Plaskett’s ~$8,000; Epstein’s $32,000 to DNC) but not a full accounting by member or committee ^{[1] [2] [3]}. If you want a complete, cited roll call of contributions and precise sums per House member, the current set of articles does not contain that dataset — reporters point instead to databases like OpenSecrets for that deeper work ^[3].

6. How to pursue a definitive, verifiable list

To compile a fully sourced, member-by-member list you would need to query FEC-derived databases (OpenSecrets is explicitly referenced) and cross-check with the documents being released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act; the supplied materials point you to OpenSecrets for donor lookups but do not themselves publish a House-wide list or totals ^{[3] [6]}. Given the political use of isolated figures in these stories, an independent FEC/OpenSecrets query would be the most reliable next step to produce a comprehensive accounting.

Limitations and final note: this analysis uses only the articles and resources you provided; they document select donations tied to Epstein and how those facts were used politically, but they do not contain an exhaustive, member-by-member monetary tally — that data would require querying the FEC/OpenSecrets records referenced in reporting ^{[3] [1] [2]}.