Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Which House members voted for the spending bills that triggered the 2025 shutdown?

Checked on November 4, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive Summary

The core fact is clear: a House floor vote in 2025 approved a Republican-led continuing funding measure by a narrow, party-line margin; the yes votes were overwhelmingly Republican with one or two cross-party exceptions reported in different records, and the measure’s passage in the House preceded Senate rejection and the shutdown. Official roll-call tallies differ across accounts (215–214, 217–212), so identifying the exact roster of individual yes-voters requires consulting the House Clerk’s certified roll call for the specific motion [1] [2] [3].

1. The Vote That Lit the Fuse — Narrow Passage, Party Line Dynamics

The House passed a short-term appropriations measure that became the immediate trigger for the 2025 shutdown because the Senate repeatedly blocked consideration. Contemporary reports record narrow majorities: one official roll call shows 215 yeas to 214 nays, largely along party lines with most Republicans voting yes and Democrats opposing [1]. Other contemporaneous accounts and bill summaries record a 217–212 result on a related continuing resolution, again reflecting a nearly uniform Republican yes vote with very limited Democratic crossover [2] [4]. The consistent theme across these tallies is a razor-thin, partisan margin that sent a House-passed bill to a Senate that would not concur, precipitating a lapse in funding [3].

2. Who Crossed the Aisle? Conflicting Lists and One or Two Holdouts

Accounts disagree on the exact number of cross-party yes votes and the identity of dissenting Republicans. One synthesis reports all but two Republicans supported the measure, with no Democrats in favor, implying a nearly unanimous Republican caucus save for two no votes [1]. Another widely cited report names Jared Golden, a Democrat, as a yes vote, and lists two Republicans — Thomas Massie and Victoria Spartz — among the no votes [3]. These inconsistencies matter, because a single cross-party vote can change the political framing of culpability for the shutdown; resolving them requires consulting the House Clerk’s roll-call file tied to that specific vote number and date [1] [4].

3. The Senate Response — Multiple Failures and the Shutdown’s Mechanics

After the House passed its continuing resolution, the Senate repeatedly failed to advance the measure, with cloture votes and motions to proceed falling short of the 60-vote threshold needed to overcome a filibuster or unanimous-consent obstacles. Reports catalog a series of failed cloture votes and procedural motions that kept funding bills from becoming law, and the Senate’s inaction transformed a House-passed bill into the proximate cause of the shutdown [5] [6]. Thus the shutdown was not solely a House construct: the legislative chain broke when the Senate could not or would not approve the House text, a dynamic captured consistently in contemporaneous roll calls and news coverage [3].

4. Why the Roll-Call Numbers Don’t Match — Multiple Related Votes and Dates

The conflicting tallies (215–214, 217–212, and other variants) stem from multiple, closely timed House votes on related funding measures and amendments across March, September, and October 2025, each with slightly different counts and member behaviors. One House vote tied to H.R.1968 in March shows a 217–213 margin, while another House action tied to H.R.5371 in September/October shows a 217–212 or 217–213 split depending on which procedural motion is counted [4] [2] [7]. Different roll-call numbers reflect different motions — passage, amendments, or procedural steps — so pinpointing who “voted for the bills that triggered the shutdown” requires matching the member roster to the exact motion and date listed in the Clerk’s record [1] [7].

5. The Bottom Line for Accountability — Names, Records, and Where to Verify

Attribution of responsibility for the shutdown rests on the certified House roll call for the specific continuing resolution passed immediately before the Senate rejections. Official House Clerk records provide the definitive roster of yes and no votes and are the primary document for accountability [1]. Independent news databases and aggregated roll-call tools can display the same lists and allow filtering by member and party, but variations in reporting reflect which specific vote reporters referenced [2] [4]. For a conclusive, member-by-member list, consult the Clerk’s roll-call entry for the precise roll number and date tied to the appropriations motion that immediately preceded the Senate’s blockade [1] [7].

Want to dive deeper?
Which House members voted for the FY2025 continuing resolution that led to the shutdown?
How did key committee chairs (e.g., House Appropriations members) vote on the 2025 spending bills?
Which House Republicans and Democrats supported the 2025 spending bills that triggered the shutdown?
Were there notable defections or swing votes in the House roll call on the 2025 spending measures?
Where can I find the official roll call records (CLERK or Congress.gov) for the 2025 spending bill votes?