Which specific House members voted ‘nay’ (to oppose tabling) on Roll Call 322 for H.Res.939, and where can the full roll‑call list be accessed?

1. What the vote was and where it is recorded

The recorded vote in question was Roll Call 322 in the 119th Congress (1st Session), the “On Motion to Table” vote for H.Res.939, the resolution to impeach President Donald J. Trump, and the House Clerk’s official roll‑call entry for Roll Call 322 is the primary public record of that vote ^{[1] [2]}. Congress.gov also maintains a House Roll Call Vote entry for vote number 322 in the 119th Congress, which reproduces the recorded quorum counts and member‑by‑member votes, and GovTrack provides a searchable, annotated rendition of the same roll call for public use ^{[3] [4]}.

2. Where to find the specific ‘nay’ names — the authoritative sources

To obtain the precise list of Members who voted “nay” on the motion to table, consult the Clerk of the House’s Roll Call 322 page (Clerk.house.gov/Votes/2025322), which publishes the entire yea‑and‑nay list with each Representative’s name and vote entry; that page is the official, contemporaneous record produced by the House Clerk’s office ^{[1] [2]}. For redundancy and easier searching, Congress.gov’s House Roll Call Vote 322 reproduces the same member‑level data and the Library of Congress index for roll‑call votes ^[3], and GovTrack offers a user‑friendly presentation and context for the question and how Members voted ^[4].

3. Why this matters and how to interpret the lists

The distinction between “nay” and other votes matters because this roll call recorded a procedural motion — whether to table the impeachment resolution — and the Clerk’s list shows individual Members’ procedural positions ^[1]; third‑party tools like GovTrack clarify that “yea/aye” and “nay/no” are terms used variably but equivalently in congressional practice, which is helpful for interpreting historical vote language ^[4]. Readers should use the Clerk’s roster to attribute responsibility and positioning to named Members, since news summaries can conflate procedural opposition with ultimate positions on final passage unless the roll call is consulted directly ^{[1] [3]}.

4. Limits of available reporting and recommended next steps

The available source set conclusively identifies where the full roll‑call and member names are published — the House Clerk’s Roll Call 322 page and mirrored listings on Congress.gov and GovTrack — but the provided snippets do not enumerate the individual “nay” names in‑text here, so this report stops short of reproducing a member‑by‑member list and instead directs to the authoritative pages where those names appear ^{[1] [2] [3]}. For precise attribution, download or view the Clerk’s Roll Call 322 transcript and cross‑check with Congress.gov’s Roll Call 322 page; for analysis of patterns and partisanship across those who voted “nay,” use GovTrack’s contextual tools and the leadership statement released by House Democrats the same day for political framing ^{[4] [5]}.

5. Context and potential framing from political actors

The procedural vote on tabling was followed by public leadership messaging — for example, House Democratic leaders issued a joint statement framing the impeachment resolution as a response to threats posed by the subject of the resolution — and those communications illustrate how parties sought to frame the vote result for news coverage, which makes consulting the raw roll‑call essential to cut through partisan narratives ^[5]. When assessing who voted “nay,” readers should be alert to partisan messaging that may highlight select names or regions; only the full Clerk roll‑call entry provides the complete, unedited record of every Member’s vote ^{[1] [2]}.