Which major retailers publicly pledged not to donate to Donald Trump or his campaign?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Very few major retailers issued explicit, public pledges framed as “we will not donate to Donald Trump or his campaign”; instead the public record shows denials of specific viral claims (notably Sephora) and broader evidence that corporations rarely — and often legally cannot — give directly to presidential campaigns, leaving most assertions about corporate donations to be about individuals or PACs tied to companies [1] [2] [3].
1. The narrow, documented example: Sephora’s public denial
The clearest public statement from a major retailer in the 2024–25 cycle came when Sephora publicly denied a viral social-media claim that it had made a “BIG” donation to Donald Trump’s campaign, telling reporters and fact-checkers that “Sephora does not make corporate donations to political candidates,” and campaign finance records show no corporate contributions from Sephora or its parent that would support the claim [1] [2].
2. Why “pledges not to donate” are rare and legally complicated
Part of the reason there are so few explicit “we will not donate” pledges from retailers is legal and practical: federal law and campaign rules mean corporations cannot simply write checks to federal candidates, and most reporting and watchdog work distinguishes between corporate treasury donations, company PACs, and individual employees or executives making personal contributions — a nuance highlighted by OpenSecrets and repeated in multiple fact-checks [3] [4].
3. Misleading lists and the role of fact-checkers
Social posts and aggregated lists have repeatedly implied that brands such as Walmart, McDonald’s, or others donated directly to Trump or to Project 2025, but investigations by Snopes and other outlets show those lists often conflate individual donations, donations to inaugural committees or PACs, defunct brands, and corporate non-donations; Snopes concluded many entries were inaccurate or lacked documentary support [5].
4. Corporate distancing versus explicit anti-donation pledges
More common than flat pledges not to donate are actions by companies to distance themselves from Trump-era policies or to stop selling Trump-branded goods — campaigns like Grab Your Wallet maintain lists of retailers that do not carry Trump products and highlight commercial choices rather than explicit political-donation commitments [6]. Historical coverage from the Washington Post also shows companies “backing away” from associations with Trump under customer pressure, an approach that is often pragmatic reputation management rather than a formal pledge about campaign donations [7].
5. The difference between donations, PACs and inaugural funds
Reporting on corporate support for Trump’s post-2024 transition includes firms that gave to an inaugural committee or whose executives gave personally; Newsweek’s roster of companies supporting Trump or his inaugural committee illustrates how donations to transition or inaugural vehicles — and executive-level gifts — are often reported as corporate support even when corporate-treasury contributions would be illegal or unlikely [8]. This taxonomical confusion fuels calls for boycotts even when corporate policy is neutral or legally constrained [3].
6. What can be said with confidence and what remains unclear
It can be stated with confidence that Sephora publicly denied donating to Trump and that fact-checkers and federal-record databases show no corporate donations from Sephora to the campaign [1] [2]. It cannot be affirmed from the provided reporting that a long list of major retailers issued formal pledges not to donate to Trump’s campaign; the available material instead shows denials, clarifications about legal limits on corporate donations, third-party lists of retailers not selling Trump products, and frequent conflation of corporate entities with individuals or PAC activity in social media claims [5] [3] [6].