Which official reports (Capitol Police, MPD, DOJ) list officer injury totals for January 6 2021 and how do their numbers differ?

Checked on January 7, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Three different official sources produce different officer-injury totals for January 6, 2021: a U.S. Capitol Police internal report and annual metrics show only 26 officers reported injuries in calendar‑year 2021 with 22 of those tied to January 6 (USCP), the Department of Justice’s filings and public statements cite roughly 134–140 assaulted officers total — including court filings that break the count into 81 U.S. Capitol Police and 58 Metropolitan Police Department officers — and oversight work by the Government Accountability Office and other reporting documents indicate many officers never filed formal reports, suggesting official counts understate the human toll [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. Official tallies: what each report actually lists

The U.S. Capitol Police’s Office of Professional Responsibility annual reporting for calendar 2021 records 26 officers injured that year, and explicitly notes that 22 of those reports were directly attributed to the January 6 attack — a narrow, department-level reporting metric rather than a public “assaults” tally [1]. The Department of Justice, in court filings early in 2021, stated that approximately 134 police officers were assaulted during the riots, specifying 81 Capitol Police officers and 58 Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police Department officers as sustaining injuries in the course of the insurrection (Newsweek sourcing the DOJ court filing) [2]. Media outlets and later DOJ prosecutors have reported the same rounded figure — “about 140” officers injured — and DOJ leadership has told Congress and the public that more officers were likely injured than the narrow official reports reflect [5] [6] [3]. The Government Accountability Office’s post‑event work surveyed deployed officers and documented injuries and operational failures but did not publish a single definitive, consolidated injury count; instead the GAO noted response rates and disruption to reporting that complicate totals [4].

2. Why the numbers diverge: definitions, reporting channels and timing

The discrepancies arise from differing definitions (injury reports vs. assaults documented in prosecutions), differing reporting channels (internal USCP use‑of‑force and injury logs, MPD records, and DOJ prosecutorial filings that aggregate assaults across agencies), and timing — many officers did not or could not complete formal incident reports in the immediate aftermath, and some later medical or psychological injuries were reported months afterward or not at all [1] [4] [3]. The USCP annual report’s 26‑officer figure reflects the department’s internal injury-reporting process for calendar 2021 and is not the same as the DOJ’s count of officers “assaulted” in criminal case filings; DOJ’s 134–140 figure aggregates assaults across multiple agencies and includes injuries documented in criminal investigations and prosecutions [1] [2]. Oversight reporting and interviews with officers show many injuries—concussions, traumatic brain injuries, chemical exposures and psychological trauma—were not captured by immediate administrative forms, producing a likely undercount in departmental metrics [4] [7].

3. Conflicting incentives and the politics of counting

Counting choices are not neutral: departments must balance personnel privacy, worker‑compensation processes, discipline and legal exposure, while prosecutors assemble evidence to support charges and narrative framing in court filings; independent watchdogs and news outlets emphasize broader human impacts, sometimes citing the higher rounded figure of “about 140” to capture MPD, Capitol Police and other agencies together [2] [5] [6]. Prosecutors have pushed back publicly that even DOJ’s figures are probably conservative and that the attack may represent the largest single‑day mass assault on U.S. law enforcement in history, signaling an institutional interest in documenting a larger scope of harm for both legal and historical record purposes [3]. Conversely, internal administrative tallies can appear smaller because they rely on formal incident reports and narrowly defined categories of “injury” [1].

4. Bottom line: what can be stated with confidence

It is empirically clear from the cited documents that counts differ: USCP internal reporting shows 26 officers injured in its calendar 2021 metrics with 22 tied to Jan. 6 [1], DOJ court filings and public statements cite roughly 134–140 officers assaulted across agencies — often broken out as 81 Capitol Police and 58 MPD — and GAO oversight plus reporting by major outlets documents gaps and likely underreporting driven by definitions, reporting failures and delayed disclosures [2] [3] [4]. Available sources do not produce a single reconciled roster of every physical and psychological injury; declaring one public “official” number therefore conflates different record‑keeping systems and purposes [1] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
How did the DOJ’s Jan. 6 court filings define and count ‘assaulted’ officers?
What methodology did the U.S. Capitol Police use to collect and classify injury reports in 2021?
What did the GAO recommend to improve injury reporting and after‑action accounting following Jan. 6?