Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What parties have kept thegoverment closed in previous years
Executive Summary
Both major U.S. parties — Republicans and Democrats — have played roles in past federal government shutdowns; historical shutdowns occurred under presidents and Congresses controlled by each party at different times, and recent polling shows Americans spread blame across both parties. Key episodes cited include multiple Reagan-era funding lapses, the 1995–1996 Clinton-era shutdowns driven by a Republican Congress, the 2013 Republican-led shutdown over the Affordable Care Act, and the 2018–2019 Trump-era shutdown over border-wall funding [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. What the original statement actually claimed — and the evidence behind it
The original claim — that particular parties “have kept the government closed in previous years” — rests on a factual historical record showing shutdowns tied to both Republican and Democratic actors. Sources document multiple shutdowns in the 1980s under Republican President Ronald Reagan, lengthy 1995–1996 shutdowns during Democratic President Bill Clinton with a Republican House and Senate, a 2013 shutdown driven by House Republicans opposing the Affordable Care Act, and the 2018–2019 shutdown tied to Republican President Donald Trump’s border-wall demand [1] [2] [3]. These accounts converge on the fact that shutdowns are not exclusive to a single party; instead, they arise from interbranch and intraparty standoffs over budget provisions and policy riders. The provided sources present a consistent baseline: both parties have at times been the proximate actors in funding lapses.
2. Who was in power when shutdowns happened — a quick, clarifying timeline
Across the documented shutdowns, control of the White House, House, and Senate varied. Reagan-era funding lapses occurred under a Republican president in the 1980s and were often about budget language and foreign aid [1]. The 1995–1996 shutdowns involved a Democratic president and Republican congressional control, producing the longest pre-2000 era lapse [1] [4]. The 2013 shutdown occurred when Republicans controlled the House and sought to block the Affordable Care Act, while the 2018–2019 record shutdown happened under Republican President Trump and a Republican House (initially) with Democrats resisting wall funding, illustrating that control patterns differ across episodes [2] [3] [5]. These details show that shutdowns frequently reflect cross-branch conflict, not simply one-party unilateral action.
3. Why the parties clashed — issues and tactics that repeatedly trigger shutdowns
The recurring themes across shutdowns are budgetary riders and major policy disputes: entitlement and spending levels, health-care implementation, immigration and border security, and tax or deficit priorities figure prominently. Republican-led actions have often centered on spending cuts or blocking Democratic policy priorities (e.g., opposing the ACA in 2013), while Democratic demands have included protections for immigrants and extensions of tax credits or social programs [2] [6]. Sources note that shutdowns can be tactical, with factions like the Tea Party or hard-right Republicans leveraging appropriations to force concessions, while Democrats have at times used shutdown leverage to extract policy gains or defend program funding [2] [5]. The evidence shows policy stakes and negotiation posture, not partisan identity alone, drive shutdowns.
4. How the public has assigned blame — survey evidence and its limits
Poll data cited in the analyses show Americans often split responsibility across parties, though blame can tilt depending on the context and framing. A recent AP‑NORC poll found roughly six in ten Americans assign a great deal or quite a bit of responsibility to President Trump and Republicans in Congress, while a bit over half say the same of Democrats — indicating shared culpability but some asymmetry in public perception [7]. Other summaries suggest voters blame the party seen as holding out for a specific policy demand (e.g., wall funding or health‑care riders), illustrating that perceived motive and visible demands shape blame assignment [8] [6]. Polling timing and question wording matter; the same historical events can yield different public impressions depending on how the dispute is portrayed.
5. Conflicting narratives and evident agendas in source accounts
The source set presents multiple emphases: some accounts highlight Republican responsibility for high-profile shutdowns (e.g., 2018–19), while others stress past Republican and Democratic culpability alike, noting earlier Reagan‑era and Clinton‑era episodes [2] [1] [4]. Certain analyses point to intra‑party factions (Tea Party) as drivers, which frames shutdowns as a consequence of ideological insurgencies within a party rather than simple two‑party competition [2]. These narrative choices reflect different editorial aims: some sources foreground the most recent, politically salient shutdown for attribution, while others provide a long arc showing bipartisan involvement. Readers should note those emphases as indicative of framing choices rather than disagreement on basic facts.
6. Bottom line and where to look next for verification
The historical record in the provided analyses establishes that both Republicans and Democrats have been involved in government shutdowns, with episodes tied to specific policy fights and changing control of branches. For further verification and detailed episode-by-episode breakdowns consult the enumerations and timelines referenced in the sources above, which list multiple shutdowns since 1980 and annotate who controlled the White House and Congress during each lapse [1] [4]. Those compilations are the best available starting points to trace responsibility by episode and to understand how policy conflicts and tactical choices, rather than party labels alone, produce shutdowns.