Which US presidents have been labeled fascist and by whom?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Multiple contemporary sources show that Donald Trump has been widely labeled “fascist” or accused of exhibiting “fascistic” tendencies by journalists, scholars, politicians and opinion writers, especially around his 2024 campaign and return to the presidency in 2025 [1] [2] [3]. Experts and commentators disagree sharply: some historians and specialists warn the label is misleading or historically inaccurate, while many political scientists, columnists and editorial writers argue Trump’s rhetoric and moves fit a modern or “proto‑fascist” pattern [3] [2] [4].
1. Who has applied the fascist label — a rapid tally of voices
Journalists, columnists and many political commentators have called Donald Trump a fascist or fascist‑leaning: examples in the provided material include The Nation and New Statesman columnists and various opinion writers [2] [4]. Academic and public intellectuals — including rising numbers of political scientists and historians surveyed in reviews and articles — have described Trump as fascist or proto‑fascist, especially around 2024–2025 [1] [3]. Former political figures and campaign rivals also used the term in campaign rhetoric; the Democratic nominee Kamala Harris reportedly called Trump a fascist during the 2024 campaign [5] [2].
2. Which experts push back — caution from specialists
Several established historians and fascism scholars caution against an unnuanced application of the word. The academic literature cited notes that many “genuine specialists” — including historians like Roger Griffin, Matthew Feldman, Stanley Payne and Ruth Ben‑Ghiat in prior surveys — do not classify Trump as a prototypical fascist in the inter‑war European sense [3]. Scholarly analyses argue Trumpism may instead be better described as authoritarian populism or “proto‑fascism,” acknowledging overlap in tactics without equating modern U.S. politics with 1930s fascism [3].
3. What evidence proponents cite — patterns and behaviors
Writers arguing the label fits point to repeated attacks on democratic institutions (courts, media, and elections), nationalist and exclusionary rhetoric, and policy blueprints like Project 2025 that, critics say, centralize executive control and weaken civil service independence [6] [7] [3]. Opinion pieces and some scholars highlight the 2024 campaign and actions in early 2025 as intensifying those traits, prompting broader use of the term in public debate [1] [8].
4. What skeptics emphasize — historical specificity and conceptual limits
Scholars skeptical of equating Trump with classical fascists stress the unique conditions of inter‑war Europe and technical definitional markers of fascism—mass single‑party rule, paramilitary seizure of the state, explicit totalitarian program—that they argue are not fully present in the U.S. context. The peer‑reviewed literature referenced explicitly warns against shallow historical analogies and calls for precise concepts such as “proto‑fascism” when describing resemblances [3].
5. How the debate plays in politics and media
The label has become a political weapon and a mobilizing frame: some left‑leaning outlets and progressive writers defend its use to rally resistance, while conservative outlets call it a smear [5] [8]. Media coverage has amplified both alarmist and cautious voices, and public figures — former officials, columnists, and Nobel‑signing intellectuals referenced in reporting — have joined both sides [9] [2].
6. What’s missing or not said in current reporting
Available sources do not mention exhaustive lists of every U.S. president ever labeled “fascist” by name beyond the extensive recent focus on Donald Trump; earlier historical accusations (for example, against figures like Franklin D. Roosevelt in fringe or Bund rhetoric in the 1930s) surface tangentially, but comprehensive cataloguing across all presidents is not provided in the selected material [1].
7. Bottom line for readers — interpret labels with both evidence and caution
The record in these sources shows a clear pattern: many contemporary journalists, political scientists and commentators have labeled or compared Trump to fascists, especially during and after the 2024 campaign and into 2025 [1] [2]. At the same time, prominent fascism scholars and peer‑reviewed analyses caution against equating Trump with inter‑war European fascism and recommend more precise concepts like “authoritarian populist” or “proto‑fascist” when describing similarities [3]. Readers should weigh the observable behaviors critics cite (institutional attacks, exclusionary rhetoric, Project 2025 concerns) against historians’ warnings about definitional rigor [6] [3].