Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What is the annual White House grounds maintenance budget and how is it funded?
Executive summary
Available reporting does not provide a single line-item called “White House grounds maintenance budget” with an agreed annual figure; congressional budget documents and news coverage instead show that upkeep is funded through appropriations for “The White House” within Executive Office/related accounts and that presidents also have a small discretionary refurnishing allowance historically cited as $100,000 (contextual, not the full maintenance budget) [1] [2] [3]. Outside estimates of overall White House operating budgets vary — one civics-oriented summary cites an annual operational budget “exceeding $50 million” and references groundskeepers among staff, but that is not a primary government budget document [4].
1. How the money is budgeted: congressional appropriations for “The White House”
Congress appropriates funds that cover the care, repair, refurnishing and maintenance of the White House and its grounds as part of federal budget accounts; the Executive Office congressional budget submission lists “The White House” and related operating accounts and shows programmatic funding requests rather than a separate publicly summarized grounds-only line [1]. That submission is the formal vehicle the White House uses to request funds, but final authority lies with Congress when it enacts appropriations [1].
2. Publicly cited amounts and what they mean — watch the categories
Public-facing summaries and media stories sometimes give headline numbers (for example, one site characterizes the White House’s annual operational budget as exceeding $50 million and references payroll and an 18‑acre grounds crew), but those are aggregated estimates and not the same as a discrete “grounds maintenance” appropriation in the federal budget tables [4]. The authoritative budget documents list many accounts (residence, operations, preservation) that together fund personnel and maintenance; available sources do not present a single official annual grounds-only total [1].
3. The small presidential allowance vs. broader maintenance funding
Separate from institutional maintenance appropriations, reporting and public guides note a long-standing presidential allowance for care, repair and refurnishing historically referenced around $100,000; that allowance covers certain redecorating or refurnishing costs but is not a substitute for the larger appropriated maintenance and operational funding that keeps the building and grounds functioning [2] [3]. This $100,000 figure is repeatedly cited in popular pieces but should not be interpreted as the total cost of grounds upkeep [2] [3].
4. Recent events that raise funding questions — renovations and private pledges
The 2025–2025 reporting about a major East Wing/ballroom project underscores another funding pathway: the White House has said private donations would pay for some construction projects (with pledges reported and questions raised by outlets), and news organizations are tracking whether such projects use any public maintenance or construction appropriations [5] [6] [7] [8]. FactCheck and PBS note public concern about ethics and the transparency of donor lists for the ballroom, and Reuters and PBS report the administration’s statements that private donations will be used, while also covering demolition and review procedures [6] [7] [8].
5. Transparency limits and where to look for precise accounting
If you seek a precise, auditable annual figure for grounds maintenance, available sources do not provide it as a standalone number; instead, one must consult the detailed appropriations bills and explanatory notes from Congress and the White House’s Congressional Budget Submission (often labeled “The White House” or Executive Residence/Executive Office accounts) to allocate portions of personnel, maintenance, utilities and repairs to grounds upkeep [1]. News summaries and non-government sites can give useful context and estimates but are not replacements for line-item federal appropriations [4] [1].
6. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas
Government budget documents frame requests in programmatic terms and emphasize continuity of operations; advocacy or journalistic pieces may highlight totals or single projects to criticize or defend an administration’s priorities. For example, administration materials and White House statements stress that private funds will cover certain expansions, while watchdog and fact‑checking outlets stress the need for transparency about donors and potential conflicts of interest [7] [8]. Non-official summaries that quote round operational totals (e.g., “over $50 million”) can serve to convey scale but may be used selectively to argue either fiscal prudence or excess [4].
If you want, I can pull the specific “The White House” appropriation lines from the FY2025 Congressional Budget Submission [1] and walk through which subaccounts typically fund grounds-related labor, contracts and repairs; that would show the nearest available official accounting even if it still won’t isolate a single “grounds maintenance” line.