Did the White House issue an official statement about Macron allegedly threatening Candace Owens?

1. What Owens actually posted — the claim and the phrasing

Candace Owens posted that “both the White House and our counterterrorism agencies have confirmed receipt of what I reported publicly: Emmanuel Macron attempted to organize my assassination, per a source close to the first couple,” language that she repeated across social posts and which media outlets then quoted ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Multiple outlets cite her X/Twitter post as the origin of the assertion rather than a published government memo or briefing ^{[2] [3]}.

2. How the media covered Owens’s statement — broad pickup, limited sourcing

A cluster of conservative, partisan and fringe sites republished Owens’s claim verbatim and framed it as news that the White House “confirmed receipt” ^{[4] [5] [6]}. Larger mainstream and international outlets reported Owens’s allegation but characterized it as her claim and noted the lack of independent corroboration; for instance, some reporting framed the allegations as “wild” or “no credible evidence” linking Macron to violent plots as of the stories’ publication ^{[7] [3]}. These pieces show widespread pickup of Owens’s post but not evidence of a separate White House announcement ^{[7] [3]}.

3. What “confirmed receipt” likely means — bureaucratic vs. public confirmation

Owens’s wording — that officials “confirmed receipt” — can mean merely that staff took notice of or logged her communication; several outlets reproduce that phrasing instead of reporting any substantive U.S. finding or declarative statement that Macron ordered an attack ^{[1] [2]}. The articles in the provided set do not produce a White House press release, a quoted White House spokesperson, or a named intelligence official publicly confirming Macron’s culpability, suggesting the available reporting is based on Owens’s account of contact with agencies rather than an independent, official confirmation ^{[1] [2]}.

4. Credibility context: the ongoing defamation suit and prior falsehoods

Context matters: Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron filed a 22‑count defamation lawsuit against Owens in July after she promoted a multi‑part series alleging Brigitte Macron was born male — allegations the Macrons’ filing called “demonstrably false” and designed to harass ^[8]. That background is widely reported alongside Owens’s new claims and is relevant to assessing credibility and motive ^[8].

5. Differences among outlets — partisan amplification and echo chambers

Fringe and partisan sites and several “news‑style” aggregators republished the claim without independent verification, which amplifies a high‑impact allegation in sympathetic networks ^{[4] [5] [6]}. More traditional outlets reproduced Owens’s quote but noted lack of evidence linking Macron to assassination plots and cautioned about unverified claims ^{[7] [3]}. The divergence reflects differing editorial standards and audience expectations across the sampled reporting ^{[4] [7] [3]}.

6. What the provided sources do — and do not — show about the White House response

Across the collected items, the only explicit “confirmation” attributed to the White House or counterterrorism agencies appears to be Owens’s statement that they “confirmed receipt” of her allegation; none of the provided sources includes a White House press statement, a quoted White House spokesperson, or agency confirmation asserting Macron organized a plot ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Therefore, available sources do not mention an official White House declaration that Macron threatened or ordered an assassination.

7. How readers should weigh the claim

Given the lack of direct, independently sourced statements from the White House or U.S. intelligence in these articles, readers should treat Owens’s account as an allegation she says was acknowledged administratively by officials, not as proof of Macron’s culpability; the factual record in the provided reporting shows Owens’s own posts as the primary source and notes the Macrons’ pending defamation suit and prior false claims as pertinent context ^{[1] [2] [8]}.

Summary takeaway: Owens says U.S. officials “confirmed receipt” of her allegations and many outlets repeated that phrasing ^{[1] [2]}, but in the items you provided there is no independent White House statement or public agency confirmation that Emmanuel Macron ordered an assassination (available sources do not mention an official White House statement).