Which donors, foundations, or political committees have donated to Election Truth Alliance since 2020?

1. Who ETA says it is and where it asks for money

ETA presents itself as a nonprofit election-analysis organization and publishes reports and donation links on its website, including a donate page and social media links ^[2]. The site (as captured in the provided material) markets reports such as a North Carolina 2024 analysis and other election-forensics content, indicating a public fundraising presence though not revealing donors on those pages ^{[1] [2]}.

2. Public reporting of ETA activity — evidence, not funding

News and press-distribution pieces document ETA’s analyses and public statements about 2024 vote data (for example, a January 2025 press release/PR placement about Clark County, Nevada) but these stories focus on ETA’s findings and calls for audits rather than funding sources ^[3]. The PR copy quotes ETA leadership and describes their data work; it does not identify donors or foundations that support ETA ^[3].

3. What the searchable political-finance databases in the result set show (and don’t show about ETA)

The search results include OpenSecrets and FollowTheMoney pages tied to similarly named entities (Alliance for Truth / ALLIANCE FOR TRUTH PAC, LLC) that report donor and expenditure data for a super PAC or state-level entity ^{[4] [5] [6]}. Those pages document donors and outside spending for an entity called ALLIANCE FOR TRUTH, not Election Truth Alliance; the provided snippets show OpenSecrets tracks donors and expenditures for ALLIANCE FOR TRUTH PAC, LLC but do not connect that committee to ETA in the included material ^{[4] [5] [6]}. In short: databases exist for organizations with similar names, but the material here does not establish they are the same organization as Election Truth Alliance ^{[4] [5] [6]}.

4. Disambiguation: similar names can cause conflation

The available reporting highlights organizations named “Alliance for Truth” or “ALLIANCE FOR TRUTH PAC, LLC” tracked by OpenSecrets and FollowTheMoney ^{[4] [6] [5]}. Journalistic caution is needed: those tracking pages show donor/disclosure data for a super PAC-style committee, whereas ETA’s own site and press materials describe a nonprofit election-analysis outfit. The sources do not state these are identical entities ^{[2] [4] [5]}.

5. Claims of allegations vs. donation transparency

Independent outlets and summaries (including a Wikipedia entry cited in the results) reference ETA in the context of election-integrity claims and note the group’s public allegations about 2024 results, but those write-ups focus on ETA’s analyses and the speculative nature of some allegations rather than funding lines ^[7]. The materials provided do not assert or document donor funding to ETA since 2020 ^{[7] [3]}.

6. What’s missing from the available sources

The provided sources do not include an internal donor list, IRS Form 990, FEC filings for a named ETA political committee, or a news investigation identifying ETA donors or foundation backers. Therefore, specific donor names, foundations, or political committees giving to Election Truth Alliance since 2020 are not found in current reporting and web captures provided here ^{[2] [3] [4]}.

7. How to get a definitive donor list (next steps for reporting or verification)

To establish who donated to ETA since 2020 you would typically request: ETA’s public financial disclosures or IRS Form 990 (if a 501(c) nonprofit), any linked political committee FEC filings, and news or database searches that explicitly tie donors/foundations to ETA. None of those documents are present in the provided result set, so follow-up searches of FEC, IRS, OpenSecrets, GuideStar/Candid, or direct inquiries to ETA would be required; those steps are not documented in the current sources (available sources do not mention those follow-up results) ^{[2] [4]}.

Conclusion: The provided materials confirm Election Truth Alliance’s public work and fundraising solicitation but do not identify donors, foundations, or political committees that have given to ETA since 2020; identifying such donors will require records or reporting not included in the current sources ^{[2] [3] [4]}.