Who financed the non kings rallies
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Claims that a single billionaire — notably George Soros — directly financed the No Kings rallies with "millions" or "nearly $300 million" simplify a complex funding picture. Reporting and fact-checks say Indivisible and a coalition of pro‑democracy groups organized the events, some of which have previously received grants from philanthropic foundations including Open Society Foundations; fact‑checks warn against conflating grants to allied groups with direct payment for the protests [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Who organized No Kings and what organizers say about funding
Organizers identify Indivisible as the principal convener alongside a coalition of more than 200 pro‑democracy partner organizations; Indivisible’s leadership framed the marches as grassroots civic action and civic defense of constitutional norms [1] [3]. Public event infrastructure — listings on Mobilize and the No Kings site — show volunteer signups and small‑donation pathways consistent with decentralized, digitally coordinated organizing rather than a single paymaster [5] [6].
2. The Soros allegation: what sources actually report
Multiple outlets reported that Open Society Foundations (OSF), founded by George Soros, has provided grants to progressive groups that participated in or are allied with the No Kings coalition; some news stories and commentators interpreted those grant links as OSF “funding” the rallies [3] [4]. That reporting documents charitable grants to organizations in the ecosystem but does not, in the cited sources, present a paper trail showing OSF writing checks directly to fund march logistics on the ground [3] [4].
3. What fact‑checking found and why the $300M figure is misleading
Independent fact‑checking by Snopes concluded that claims a few billionaires supplied nearly $300 million specifically for No Kings confuse broader philanthropic support for progressive organizations with direct protest‑funding; Snopes says analyses that produced large aggregate dollar totals conflated general grants and donations with money spent on particular rallies [2]. In short: substantial philanthropic giving to allied groups exists, but the leap to “$300M for No Kings” is a category error in the fact‑checkers’ assessment [2].
4. What mainstream reporting established about turnout and organizer statements
Reuters and other mainstream outlets covered the October rallies as large, mostly peaceful demonstrations organized by Indivisible with partner groups; Reuters quoted Indivisible leaders estimating millions of participants and noted zero or very few protest‑related arrests in major cities, underscoring the civic‑style framing organizers emphasized [1]. These articles centered on crowd size and civic messaging rather than detailed donor accounting [1].
5. Data aggregators and partisan reconstructions: use caution
Independent projects and partisan data pages have attempted to map money flows into the event ecosystem — for instance, reconstructed flows linking federal grants, philanthropic funding and small‑dollar donations to nonprofits connected to the June rally — but those reconstructions are often partial, inferential and sometimes hosted by ideologically driven sites [7]. Such reconstructions can be useful leads but do not substitute for transparent, audited accounting linking a funder to specific event expenditures [7].
6. Competing narratives and political incentives
Republican commentators and some outlets amplified the Soros narrative to suggest centralized orchestration or to portray protests as externally funded agitation; proponents of the protests stress volunteerism, small‑donation grassroots activity, and coalition organizing [4] [3]. Both narratives serve political aims: one delegitimizes the protests by pointing to elite backers, the other preserves the movement’s grassroots credentials by emphasizing decentralized participation [4] [1].
7. Limitations of available reporting
Available sources document that philanthropic foundations have funded organizations in the No Kings coalition and that Indivisible led planning, but they do not provide a single comprehensive ledger showing exactly how much any foundation spent directly on rally logistics across all cities [2] [3] [1]. If you are seeking documentary proof of a specific donor paying for venues, permits or transportation for the rallies nationwide, available sources do not mention that direct accounting [2] [7].
8. What to watch next and how to verify claims
To verify specific funding claims: request grant records or IRS Form 990 summaries from the named foundations and recipient organizations; compare line items for event grants or program support to dates and descriptions of No Kings activities; and look for vendor payment records, permit filings or bank statements if disclosed by organizers or uncovered by investigative reporting. Reporters and fact‑checkers will be the key sources to watch for such granular accounting; current mainstream and fact‑check sources—Reuters and Snopes—urge caution about broad numeric claims until direct evidence is produced [1] [2].
Bottom line: open‑society grants and large philanthropic gifts to allied progressive groups are documented, but current reporting and fact‑checking show those facts do not equate to a documented, centralized multihundred‑million‑dollar funder paying for the No Kings rallies themselves [2] [3] [1].