How has the phrase been used in modern U.S. political speech and who first placed it on that podium?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The two-word phrase "founding fathers" entered modern U.S. political speech as a rhetorical device to summon authority, continuity and constitutional legitimacy, and scholars trace its first prominent political deployment to Senator Warren G. Harding at the 1916 Republican National Convention, after which he repeatedly used it and helped cement it into the national lexicon [1]. Since then the phrase has been recycled across the ideological spectrum—used to legitimize competing policy positions, to anchor partisan claims in historical permanence, and to manufacture a sense of inherited consensus even when the Framers’ views are disputed [1] [2].
1. How it first reached the podium: Harding’s 1916 intervention
Historical surveys of political language credit Warren G. Harding with the first notable invocation of "founding fathers" in American politics when he spoke at the Republican National Convention in 1916 and thereafter repeatedly employed the phrase throughout his career, giving a name to a loosely defined set of 18th-century framers and making the term available as a rhetorical prop for later politicians [1].
2. What the phrase does in modern political speech: legitimation and myth-making
Political communication scholars observe that phrases like "founding fathers" function as powerful legitimating devices: they compress complex constitutional history into a portable symbol that speakers use to claim continuity, to frame policy as faithful to tradition, and to delegitimize opposing interpretations by implying they depart from an authoritative origin story [2]. That compressive power makes the phrase useful across contexts—from presidential speeches to stump talk—because it performs the political work of anchoring arguments to an imagined consensus.
3. Bipartisan reuse and ideological flexibility
Although Harding, a Republican, first popularized the phrase in a party setting, later uses transcend party lines: historians of political vocabulary and contemporary usage surveys show that many such phrases are adopted, retooled, and weaponized by both conservatives and liberals to support divergent aims—conservatives often invoke the Framers to resist change while progressives sometimes appeal to founding principles like equality or popular sovereignty to argue for reform—demonstrating the phrase’s ideological malleability [1] [2].
4. The phrase as shorthand—and its risks
Lists of American political catchphrases highlight how compact slogans and labels gain traction by simplifying complex debates, but that same simplification carries risk: invoking the "founding fathers" as a monolithic authority masks deep disagreement among the Framers themselves and invites selective citation of history to bolster present-day agendas, a dynamic critics and scholars warn can create misleading historical narratives when deployed rhetorically [3] [2].
5. How the press and public memory amplify the phrase
Compilations of political language and media glossaries show that once a phrase like "founding fathers" is routinized it becomes a staple of stump speeches, editorial lines and classroom shorthand, which reinforces its perceived legitimacy; public-facing platforms and campaign playbooks treat such phrases as reusable framing tools rather than disciplines of scholarship, increasing their cultural potency even as historical nuance recedes [3] [4].
6. Limits of the record and alternative explanations
Available sources clearly attribute first prominent political use to Harding in 1916 and document the phrase’s later ubiquity, but they do not provide a full transcript of Harding’s convention remarks here nor a comprehensive catalogue of every major subsequent invocation; historians note parallel processes by which other phrases entered political speech (e.g., “Where’s the beef?” or “It’s the economy, stupid”) showing that ad hoc rhetorical coinages, advertising echoes and campaign staff slogans all feed the same phenomenon [1] [3].