Who founded the Election Truth Alliance and what are their backgrounds?
Executive summary
The Election Truth Alliance (ETA) is described by its own channels and news coverage as a group founded in December 2024 by three people identified by first names and professional roles: “Nathan,” a cybersecurity specialist and Army Reserve 25B; “Lilli,” a Canadian policy analyst with backgrounds in political science and history; and “Jive,” an auditor and chartered accountant who began analyzing public election data in late 2024 [1] [2]. Newsweek reports ETA as a self-described nonpartisan nonprofit that issued a Clark County, Nevada analysis alleging results “consistent with vote manipulation” [3].
1. Who the founders are — names, roles and origin story
ETA’s Substack post lists three founders by first name and professional descriptions: Nathan (cybersecurity specialist; 25 Bravo in the U.S. Army Reserve), Lilli (Canadian policy analyst; political science and history background), and Jive (auditor and chartered accountant who began finding anomalies in election data in November 2024) and says the three came together within two months after the 2024 U.S. election [1]. ETA’s own website highlights the group’s publications, including a North Carolina 2024 Election Data Analysis and statements on alleged forensic audits, which align with the founders’ described focus on technical and data-driven review [2].
2. What backgrounds the sources claim — expertise and implied authority
The group presents a mix of cybersecurity, policy analysis, and auditing skills as its core competencies: cybersecurity for technical scrutiny of systems (Nathan), policy and comparative knowledge for interpreting election rules and context (Lilli), and accounting/auditing for irregularity detection in vote totals or reporting (Jive) [1]. ETA’s public materials and its North Carolina and Clark County analyses suggest the founders are positioning the organization to apply those complementary skills to election-data forensics [2] [1].
3. What independent reporting confirms or adds
Newsweek summarizes ETA as “self-described nonpartisan” and reports it was founded in December 2024, noting ETA issued a Clark County, Nevada analysis that it said was “consistent with vote manipulation” [3]. That account corroborates the founding timeframe and public posture (nonpartisan/self-described) but does not independently verify the founders’ full biographies beyond ETA’s own descriptions [3].
4. What the available sources do not mention
Available sources do not mention full legal names, résumés, academic records, prior public-sector or private-sector employment histories, or independent vetting of the founders’ claimed credentials beyond the Substack summary and ETA’s website [1] [2]. Sources also do not provide documents such as professional licenses, service records, or third-party confirmation of the roles (not found in current reporting).
5. How ETA frames its work and the surrounding debate
ETA frames its work as statistical and forensic analysis pointing to “red flags” and alleged anomalies — for example, contrasting machine-count precincts and hand-count precincts in their North Carolina release and issuing statements on alleged forensic audits of the 2024 U.S. election [2]. Newsweek places ETA’s Clark County claims in the broader media debate around 2024 “rigged” election assertions and notes ETA called for further investigation, signaling that ETA’s findings feed into a contentious public conversation [3].
6. Competing perspectives and limits of current reporting
The reporting and ETA’s public posts present ETA’s claims and their founders’ backgrounds largely via ETA’s own descriptions, while independent outlets like Newsweek report on ETA’s assertions without confirming the founders’ identities beyond the organizational claim [1] [3]. FollowTheMoney/OpenSecrets entries returned in the search results appear to relate to other groups named “Alliance for Truth” or “ALLIANCE FOR TRUTH PAC, LLC,” and available sources do not link those entities directly to the Election Truth Alliance or its founders [4] [5]. Therefore, the degree to which ETA’s founders’ professional claims have been independently verified is not addressed in current reporting (not found in current reporting).
7. What to watch next and how to evaluate claims
Verify full names and professional credentials via public records, professional registries, or independent reporting; look for audit methodology, data sources and reproducible code or datasets to assess ETA’s technical claims; and check state election officials’ responses or independent forensic statisticians’ reviews for corroboration or refutation (available sources do not mention these verifications) [2] [1] [3]. News coverage so far treats ETA’s work as claim-driven and situated within a polarized debate over the 2024 election [3].
In sum, ETA presents itself as founded by three specialists (cybersecurity, policy analysis, auditing) who began collaborating after the 2024 election; reporting corroborates the organization’s claims about its founding date and public analyses but does not independently verify full founder identities or credentials in the sources provided [1] [2] [3].