Who founded the Election Truth Alliance?

1. How the group publicly frames its origin—and what it omits

The ETA’s own “About Us” material presents the organization as a nonprofit, non‑partisan group formed in December 2024 to share independent data and research on the 2024 U.S. presidential election, but it does not list specific founders on that page ^[1]. That omission is important: an organization’s public description choosing to emphasize mission and collective origin while withholding founder names can reflect a deliberate communications stance or a simple update lag. The absence of names on the ETA’s official about page forces reliance on secondary accounts for personnel details and means the group’s own documentation does not corroborate individual founder identities even as it confirms the founding timeframe ^[1].

2. Secondary accounts that name three co‑founders and what they claim

Multiple secondary sources and profiles attribute the founding to three individuals: Nathan (cybersecurity specialist and U.S. Army Reserve 25 Bravo), Lilli McGregor (Canadian policy analyst), and Jive (auditor/chartered accountant) and describe them as the founding board steering a non‑profit, non‑partisan ETA formed in December 2024 ^{[2] [3] [4]}. These accounts provide distinct professional backgrounds that, if accurate, would lend the group varied technical and analytical expertise. The named‑founder narrative appears in archived or third‑party profiles dated across 2025 (for example, ^[2] is timestamped February 28, 2025), offering a consistent alternate account to the ETA’s own public page that omits names ^{[2] [3]}.

3. Official records and fact‑checking pages that contradict or do not confirm names

At least one fact‑check and a FollowTheMoney profile do not provide founder names: a fact‑check focused on litigation and activities omits founder details, while the FollowTheMoney listing for the related entity lacks founder identification despite listing the organization ^{[5] [3]}. These omissions create a divergence between named‑founder claims and the record in some registries or oversight pages, which can indicate incomplete reporting, differences in how organizations register public‑facing leadership, or that founder names were not included in regulatory filings accessible to those platforms ^{[5] [3]}.

4. Timing and consistency across sources—what matches and what doesn’t

Consensus across sources centers on December 2024 as the founding date and the organization’s mission to analyze the 2024 presidential election; where sources diverge is purely on attribution of individual founders ^{[1] [2] [4]}. Sources that name founders do so in early‑to‑mid 2025 writeups (e.g., ^[2] dated February 28, 2025, and ^[1] dated July 26, 2025), suggesting the founder narrative circulated widely after the ETA’s formation but may not have been formalized on the organization’s public pages or in official filings visible to aggregators ^{[2] [1]}. The timing implies either a lag in updating primary materials or disparate source reliance on interviews or registration documents not reflected on the ETA’s about page.

5. Possible motivations and agendas behind naming or not naming founders

The divergence invites two plausible explanations grounded in the record: either the ETA deliberately frames itself as a collective nonprofit and omits founder names on its site for privacy or strategic reasons, or third‑party profiles aggregated names from internal documents, social media, or interviews that the organization has not centralized on its official channels ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Named‑founder profiles emphasize professional credentials—cybersecurity, policy analysis, and forensic accounting—which could strengthen public credibility for election‑integrity work, while the ETA’s site prioritizing mission over personnel could be intended to project non‑partisanship and collective legitimacy ^{[2] [1]}.

6. Bottom line: what can be stated with confidence and what remains unresolved

It is a documented fact that the Election Truth Alliance publicly describes itself as a nonprofit, non‑partisan organization founded in December 2024 ^[1]. Multiple secondary profiles identify Nathan, Lilli McGregor, and Jive as co‑founders and founding board members, presenting consistent professional backgrounds for each ^{[2] [3] [4]}. The unresolved question is whether the ETA’s official filings or its own public materials formally recognize those three individuals as founders; the ETA’s about page does not, and other official registries consulted here do not provide matching named founder data, leaving confirmation dependent on primary documents or direct organizational disclosure ^{[1] [5]}.