Which nonprofits, PACs, or donor-advised funds have given money to the Election Truth Alliance?

1. What ETA’s sites say about funding — the obvious starting point

The Election Truth Alliance’s public site includes a donate page and content about their reports and analyses, but the pages surfaced in these search results do not disclose specific donors, grants, or links to donor-advised funds or PAC backers; the site appears to solicit donations but does not list funders in the captured pages ^{[5] [1]}.

2. Independent trackers: similar names, not a match to ETA

OpenSecrets and FollowTheMoney have records for entities called “ALLIANCE FOR TRUTH” or “ALLIANCE FOR TRUTH PAC, LLC,” including pages summarizing outside spending and expenditures, but those entries are for a committee or PAC with that name and do not explicitly identify a financial connection to “Election Truth Alliance” in the available records ^{[2] [4] [3]}. The presence of similarly named groups in campaign-finance databases does not by itself demonstrate funding relationships to ETA; available sources do not mention a formal tie.

3. No donor-advised funds, nonprofits, or PACs named in current reporting

In the set of sources provided, I find no reporting or filings that name specific nonprofits, donor-advised funds (DAFs), or PACs as donors to the Election Truth Alliance. Databases that track outside spending and organizations’ summaries either cover different entities or report no activity tied to ETA in the captured snippets ^{[2] [3] [4]}. Therefore, a direct list of ETA backers is not present in the supplied materials.

4. Where researchers normally look — and what’s missing here

Standard avenues to trace funding include an organization’s public “donors” or “financials” page, IRS Form 990 filings for nonprofit status, FEC reports for PAC activity, and OpenSecrets/FollowTheMoney aggregation of disclosed spending. The provided ETA pages do not show Form 990s or donor disclosures, and the campaign-finance pages found in these results reference a differently named PAC rather than an ETA filing ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Thus, the usual documentary trails are absent from the search results offered.

5. Possible explanations and alternative interpretations

There are several possibilities consistent with the available material: ETA could be primarily crowd-funded by small donors via its donate page (which would not show up in the datasets captured here), it could receive funding from entities that do not appear in the provided search snippets, or any funding by similarly named PACs could be coincidental and unrelated ^{[1] [2]}. Available sources do not mention the specifics of ETA’s funding sources, so we cannot confirm which of these applies.

6. Recommendations for verifying funding and next steps

To find authoritative donor information you should: (a) request ETA’s financials or Form 990 if they are a 501(c) nonprofit (their site could contain or link to those documents beyond the captured pages) ^[1]; (b) search the FEC and state campaign-finance databases for transfers between any “Alliance for Truth” entities and groups named “Election Truth Alliance” ^{[2] [3] [4]}; and (c) consult nonprofit watchdogs and journalistic reporting beyond the current results for investigative disclosure. The current documents do not provide those data points.

7. Transparency and caution — why names can mislead

Campaign- and issue-related groups often use similar branding; the existence of an “ALLIANCE FOR TRUTH PAC, LLC” in OpenSecrets and FollowTheMoney records illustrates how name overlap can create confusion when researching money flows ^{[2] [3] [4]}. Without explicit cross-references in filings or public disclosures, drawing a conclusion that a PAC or DAF funded ETA would be unsupported by the available sources.

Limitations: This analysis relies solely on the provided search results. If you want, I can (a) search external FEC, IRS Form 990, and state filings for potential links between ETA and the similarly named PACs, or (b) draft an outreach message you could send to ETA requesting donor or financial disclosures.