Who funds Election Truth Alliance and what are its major financial backers?

Checked on November 28, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Available public documents and the Election Truth Alliance’s own website show the group presents itself as a nonprofit election‑analysis organization and posts a donor dashboard and a donation page, but independent public transparency databases reviewed here (OpenSecrets, FollowTheMoney) do not list clear, attributable major funders for an entity named “Election Truth Alliance”; related names such as “Alliance for Truth PAC, LLC” appear in FEC/OpenSecrets records with no reported expenditures or disclosed donors for the 2022 cycle [1] [2] [3] [4]. Several news and press items describe ETA’s activity and leadership but do not identify its major financial backers [5] [6].

1. Who the group says it is — and what it publishes about donations

The Election Truth Alliance (ETA) publicly describes itself as a nonprofit election‑analysis organization and posts donation and donor‑dashboard pages on its website, signaling that it solicits funds and intends some level of transparency directly to supporters [1] [2]. Available ETA site pages include statements, reports and a “donate” mechanism, but those pages alone do not, in the snippets provided, list line‑item donors or large backers in the materials indexed here [1] [2].

2. What independent tracking databases show (and don’t show)

OpenSecrets and FollowTheMoney records retrieved for entities with similar names — notably “ALLIANCE FOR TRUTH PAC, LLC” and “ALLIANCE FOR TRUTH” — show either blank or zero reported expenditures and do not provide a roster of major donors or spenders for the 2022/2024 cycles in the current extracts [3] [4] [7] [8]. OpenSecrets’ pages for Alliance for Truth indicate no reported expenditures in 2022 and list $0 totals in recipient/recipient‑targeting tabs in the materials provided [8] [4]. FollowTheMoney’s brief entry for “ALLIANCE FOR TRUTH” likewise does not surface identified major donors in the snippets provided [7].

3. Reporting on the group’s activities — but not its backers

Press coverage and distributed press releases document ETA’s analyses and public claims about the 2024 election (for example, a January 2025 EIN Presswire release citing ETA analysis of Clark County, Nevada), and secondary reporting (e.g., Newsweek referenced on Wikipedia) cites ETA as one of several groups alleging irregularities; these items name leaders and findings but do not name major financial backers in the excerpts provided [5] [9]. That suggests ETA has been visible as an actor but that major funding sources have not been widely reported in the materials here.

4. Two plausible explanations for the transparency gap

Either ETA’s funding comes from small donors and retail contributions routed through its website (consistent with a “donate” page and donor dashboard) or it receives funding through affiliated entities or PACs whose records are incomplete or report $0 in visible spending in the datasets shown — but the available sources do not confirm either hypothesis directly [1] [2] [8]. OpenSecrets’ characterization of “dark money” groups generally—groups that spend without fully disclosing funders—provides context about how an organization could operate without an obvious public donor list, but the sources here do not prove ETA is funded this way [8].

5. What’s explicitly not found in current reporting

Available sources do not list named major donors or foundation grants to the Election Truth Alliance, and the FEC/OpenSecrets snippets for a similarly named PAC report no expenditures or disclosed donors for 2022 in these excerpts [4] [8] [7]. If you are seeking specific large funders, those names are not present in the materials provided here [1] [2].

6. How to pursue firm answers

To identify major financial backers with certainty, consult: (a) ETA’s full donor dashboard and tax filings (IRS Form 990 or 990‑PF if it is a 501(c) organization) on the ETA website and on IRS/third‑party archival sites; (b) FEC filings and OpenSecrets entity pages for any affiliated PACs or LLCs beyond the snippets shown; and (c) state nonprofit registries where ETA is incorporated. The snippets show ETA’s own site and OpenSecrets/FollowTheMoney pages as starting points, but the necessary detailed financial disclosures are not present in the sources provided [1] [2] [3] [7].

Conclusion

The Election Truth Alliance publicly solicits donations and has posted a donor dashboard, but the documents and databases provided here do not name or quantify major backers; related OpenSecrets/FollowTheMoney entries for “Alliance for Truth” show no reported expenditures or disclosed donors in the material cited [1] [2] [8] [7]. For definitive attribution of large funders, locate ETA’s full financial disclosures or authoritative filings — those records are not included in the current reporting [1] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the legal status and organizational structure of Election Truth Alliance (nonprofit, PAC, LLC)?
Which donors, foundations, or political committees have donated to Election Truth Alliance since 2020?
Have any dark‑money intermediaries or shell organizations funneled funds to Election Truth Alliance?
What major events, ad buys, or litigation has Election Truth Alliance funded and who financed those activities?
Are there public IRS Form 990s, FEC filings, or state disclosure reports that reveal Election Truth Alliance’s top funders?